Dineley, D. & Metcalf, S. GCR Editor: D. Palmer. 1999. Fossil Fishes of Great Britain. Geological Conservation Review Series No. 16. JNCC, Peterborough, ISBN 1 86107 470 0. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Lyme Regis Coast (Pinhay Bay–Charmouth)
(SY 32 91)-(SY 37 93)
Highlights
Lyme Regis is the most famous British Early Jurassic fish site, and is one of the best in the world. For over 200 years abundant, articulated and well-preserved specimens of bony and cartilaginous fish have been found in the cliffs near the town. Lyme Regis is the type locality for 50 or more species of fish.
Introduction
The Lias exposures on the coast around Lyme Regis, Dorset
Over 50 species of fish are recognized from here, and because of the long history of fossil collecting at this site, Lyme Regis is the type locality for many of these. Many of the remains are extremely well preserved, and beautifully articulated three-dimensional specimens have been recovered. Several complete specimens of the euselachians Acrodus and Hybodus from Lyme Regis have proved invaluable in determining the palaeobiology of hybodont sharks and in phylogenetic study of the group (Duffin, 1993b). Early neoselachians ('modern sharks', both the active predators and the skates and rays) are also present in the shark fauna (Duffin and Ward, 1993b). Chirnaeroid taxa, including many articulated specimens, are also well represented in the assemblage and Lyme Regis is the type locality for two species of squalorajoid and three species of myriacanthid holocephalians (Patterson, 1965). Lyme Regis is also the type and only locality for the coelacanth Holophagus gulo and many species of actinopterygians. The fish faunas have been described in detail by Egerton (1871, 1872a, 1872b, 1873), A.S. Woodward (1886, 1889a, 1889b; 1891a, 1906) and Woodward and Sherborn (1890), and more recently reviewed by Gardiner (1960), Patterson (1965) Thies (1983), Duffin (1993b) and Duffin and Ward (1993b) amongst others.
Description
In the earliest description of the Lower Lias section at Lyme Regis, the major lithological divi sions and the fossils they contained were noted (Egerton 1839). The abundance of ammonites meant that as early as the late 1850s, Oppel (1856) could adapt the zonal scheme for ammonites from the German sections to that in the Lyme Regis region. Numerous stratigraphers have provided detailed accounts of the Liassic succession at Lyme Regis (e.g. H.B. Woodward and Ussher, 1906; Lang 1914, 1924, 1932; Lang et al. 1923, 1928; Lang and Spath 1926; Palmer 1972). The general succession (Getty, 1980) is:
Thickness (m) | Lang's bed numbers | |
unconformity | ||
Green Ammonite Beds | 32 | 122–130 |
Belemnite Stone | 0.15 | 121 |
Belemnite Marls | 23 | 106–120 |
Armatus Limestone | 0.4 | 105 |
Black Ven Marls | 43 | 76–104 |
Shales with Beef Beds | 23 | 54–75 |
Blue Lias | 27 | 25–53 |
Ostrea Beds ( = Pre-planorbis Beds) | 2.5 | 1–24 |
The Blue Lias is a sequence of laterally extensive, alternating thin-bedded (and nodular) limestones and shales exposed in cliffs and on the foreshore west of the Cobb, and in Church Cliffs, just east of Lyme Regis (
Although the provenance of many of the earlier fossil fish finds was inadequately documented (e.g. Egerton, in De la Beebe, 1839), fishes have been collected from the 'Saurian Shales' at the top of the Blue Lias (equivalent to Lang's Bed 52: scipionianum Subzone, semicostatum Zone, Early Sinemurian), from the Shales with Beef Beds (semicostatum–turneri Zones, Early Sinemurian; MacFadyen, 1970, p. 97), and from the 'Obtusum Shale' of the Black Ven Marls (obtusum Zone, Late Sinemurian) (Woodward, 1886, 1889a, 1889b, 1891a, 1906; Rayner, 1958;
The importance of Lyme Regis as a fossil fish locality is that the material is extremely well preserved (e.g.
Fauna
Based upon collections in the NHM, BRSMG and OUM and from references including Woodward (1886, 1889a, 1889b, 1891a, 1906), Duffin (1993b) and Duffin and Ward (1993b):
Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii: Euselachii: Hybodontoidea
Acrodus nobilis Agassiz, 1837 (includes material designated
A. latus Agassiz, 1839,
A. gibberulus Agassiz, 1839 and
A. arietus Quenstedt, 1858: Woodward, 1889)
A. anningae Agassiz, 1839
Lissodus sp.
?Hybodus cloacinus Quenstedt, 1858
H. raricostatus Agassiz, 1843
H. medius Agassiz, 1843
Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii: Neoselachii: Squalomorphii
'Palaeospinax' priscus (Agassiz, 1843) nomen dubium
Synechodus occultidens Duffin and Ward, 1993
S. enniskilleni Duffin and Ward, 1993
Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii: Neoselachii: Galeomorphii
Agaleus dorsetensis Duffin and Ward, 1983
Chondrichthyes: Holocephali: Chimaeriformes
Myriacanthus paradoxus Agassiz, 1836
Metopacanthus granulatus (Agassiz, 1837)
Recurvacanthus uniserialis Duffin, 1981
Squaloraja polyspondyla (Agassiz, 1836)
S. tenuispina Woodward, 1886
Osteichthyes: Actinopterygii
Centrolepis aspera Egerton, 1844
Coccolepis liassica A.S. Woodward, 1890
Cosmolepis ornatus Egerton, 1854
Platysiagum sclerocepbalum Egerton, 1872
Osteichthyes: Actinopterygii: Saurichthyiformes
Saurorhynchus (Belonorhynchus)acutus (Agassiz, 1844)
Belonorhynchus brevirostris (Woodward, 1895)
Osteichthyes: Actinopterygii: Chondrostei: Acipenseriformes
Cbondrosteus acipenseroides Egerton, 1858
C. pacbyurus Egerton, 1858
Osteichthyes: Actinopterygii: Holostei: Ptycholepidae
Ptycholepis gracilis Davis, 1884
P. curta Egerton, 1854–1855
P. monilifer Woodward, 1895
Osteichthyes: Actinopterygii: Neopterygii: Halecostomi
Dapedium politus (Leach, 1822)
D. (Tetragonolepis) radiatus (Agassiz, 1836–1844)
D. colei Agassiz, 1835
D. punctatum Agassiz, 1835
D. granulatum Agassiz, 1835
D. magnevillei Agassiz, 1833–1836 nomen dubium
Osteichthyes: Actinopterygii: Neopterygii: Halecomorphi
Caturus heterurus (Agassiz, 1839–1844)
C. latipennis (Egerton, 1858a)
C. (Endactis) agassizi (Egerton, 1858a) nomen dubium
C. (Conodus) chirotes (Agassiz, 1839)
Furo (Eugnathus) orthostomus Agassiz, 1842–1844
Furo (E.) philpotœ Agassiz, 1839–1844
Furo (E.) minor Agassiz, 1839
F. (Lissolepis) serratus (Davies, 1884)
F. altus A.S. Woodward, 1895
F. latimanus (Agassiz, 1838–1844)
Furo sp.
Heterolepidotus rhombiter Egerton, 1834–1835 (Agassiz, 1837)
Osteoarchis macrocephalus Egerton, 1868
O. (Isoculum)granulatus (Egerton, 1868)
Osteichthyes: Actinopterygii: Neopterygii: Teleostei
Pholidolepis dorsetensis Nybelin, 1966
Pholidophorus bechei Agassiz, 1844
P. pachysomus Egerton, 1852
P. caudalis Woodward, 1895
P. crenaluata Egerton, 1843
P. limbata Agassiz, 1833–1844
Pholidophoraspis maculata Nybelin, 1966
Pholidophoropsis sp.
Pholidophoroides sp.
Proleptolepis elongata Nybelin, 1974
P. furcata Nybelin, 1974
P. megalops Nybelin, 1974
Osteichthyes: Sarcopterygii: Actinistia
Holophagus (Undina) gulo Egerton, 1861
Interpretation
About 100 'new species' were described from Lyme Regis in the 19th century, when almost every new specimen was given a name. (According to our present taxonomic list, Lyme Regis has yielded type specimens of more than 50 species.)
Hybodont sharks are well represented, and specimens recovered in the 19th century included the lectotype of Hybodus reticularis (Agassiz, 1833–45; Woodward, 1916; Maisey, 1987a), which was regarded as the type species of the genus Hybodus. Five Lyme Regis species have been referred to this genus and these are all based upon good articulated material (
Acrodus and Lissodus are also represented in the Lower Lias hybodont shark fauna at Lyme Regis
Neoselachian sharks are also fairly well represented in the Lower Lias sequence of Lyme Regis (Thies, 1983). Duffin and Ward (1993b) have revised the taxonomy of the rather poorly known palaeospinacid sharks from Lyme Regis, and grouped the material into two species of a single genus, Synechodus. The palaeospinacids are considered to belong to the squalomorph neoselachians, and are probably a sister-group to the hexanchids (Cappetta, 1987; Duffin and Ward, 1993b). They are typically small sharks, up to 1 m long with a heterodont dentition. They possibly were slow-moving benthos, feeding on fish, molluscs and crustaceans in shallow waters (Thies, 1985).
Agaleus dorsetensis Duffin and Ward, 1983 was diagnosed on isolated teeth in the Blue Lias at Church Cliff, Lyme Regis. It is thought to have been an unspecialized swimmer with a benthonic habit, subsisting on hard-shelled molluscs and crustaceans, as well as fish (Duffin and Ward, 1983b). Thies and Reif (1985) suggested a similar lifestyle for the orectolobid sharks of the Callovian (Middle Jurassic) Oxford Clay.
The holocephalians are well-represented here by both squalorajids and myriacanthid chimaeroids. Squaloraja polyspondyla Agassiz is a small form (less than 0.6 m; Patterson, 1965), known from several partial skeletons. Squaloraja is the type and only genus of the squalorajid holocephalians, an enigmatic and seemingly primitive chimaeriform family. A second species of Squaloraja has been described from Lyme Regis, S. tenuispina Woodward, based upon a single front clasper.
Lyme Regis is the type and only locality for three species of myriacanthid, including the recently diagnosed Recurvacanthus uniserialis Duffin, named on a single isolated dorsal fin spine (Duffin, 1981). The other two genera were recovered from the Lower Lias succession in the 19th century and formed the basis for the diagnosis of the myriacanthid family of chimaeroids (Patterson, 1965). Myriacanthus paradoxus Agassiz is a large chimaeriform (over 1 m in length; Woodward, 1906; Patterson, 1965) described from articulated skull fragments and partial post-cranial remains (Woodward, 1891a). In contrast, the specimens of Metopacanthus granulatus (also 'known from partial skeletal remains) only reach 1 m, and the head is much less broad and flattened (Patterson, 1965). The type specimen of Metopacanthus granulatus was originally designated Ischyodus orthorhinus by Egerton (1871), but this was later corrected by Woodward (1889a, 1891a). Lower Lias myriacanthid chimaeroids are also known from France (Terquem, 1855), Holzmaden, Germany (Fraas, 1910), Hombois, Belgium (Duffin, 1980a), and Ostenso, Italy. Both sexes possessed a large frontal clasper. Squalorajids and myriacanthids are thought to have been largely bottom-dwellers with a durophagous diet.
Lyme Regis has yielded a fish fauna that seems to retain a rich contingent of primitive actinopterygians, including four type species plus a stem neopterygian (a saurichthyid), two species of chondrosteid acipenseriforms and a stem chondrostean. The primitive actinopterygians include the type and only species, Centrolepis aspera Egerton, known from three specimens collected at Lyme Regis. Centrolepis is a small form with a robust, somewhat elongated fusiform body covered in thick and highly ornamented scales (Woodward, 1890). Coccolepis liassica Woodward is also known only from Lyme Regis. It, too, is a small fish (up to 0.14 m long;
The Lyme Regis chondrostean assemblage also includes the type specimen of the large saurichthyid species Saurorhynchus (Belonorhynchus) brevirostris (Woodward), also known from the Upper Lias of Whitby (q.v.) and Holzmaden, Germany (Reis, 1892; Woodward, 1895a). The species possessed a typically long, slender, tubular body and small head with pointed elongated mandible lined with sharp, well-spaced conical teeth (Gardiner, 1967). The acipenseriform chondrosteans Chondrosteus acipenseroides Egerton
Halecostomid actinopterygians are represented in the Lower Lias of Lyme Regis by the deep-bodied semionotid genus Dapedium. Six species of Dapedium are known from this locality including the type species, D. politus (Leach, 1822;
Caturids are most abundant at Lyme Regis and five genera (Caturus, Furo, Heterolepidotus, Ptycholepis and Osteorachis)have been described from the site. Different species and genera of caturids are essentially subdivided on the morphology and ornamentation of the head bones, and slight differences in the postcranial skeleton (Woodward, 1895a). The type genus, Caturus, possesses the general form, size and osteology typical of most of the genera listed here.
In the British Lower Liassic actinopterygian fish faunas two distinct levels of development were discernible: the halecostomid as exemplified by the semionotids such as Dapedium, and the halecomorphs such as Caturus. Both were predaceous fish, and in Dapedium the old conservative structure of the mouth and jaw mechanism persists. Here the cranial parts of the head were rigid, fully ossified, and there was a limited extent to the expansion of the mouth cavity. The fish could not make a sudden large intake of water. To catch prey speed was essential, yet the ability for fast acceleration was limited by the shape and position of the fins. In the caturids the new structure of the mouth parts and the mobility of the braincase increased suction power to the point where it aided seizure of prey, and improvements in body and fin kinetics led to an ability to seize many kinds of prey more effectively. This tendency was to be further developed amongst the teleosts.
Primitive teleosts, including eight type species, have also been recorded from the Lyme Regis cliffs
Holophagus gulo Egerton, a large (0.7 m length) coelacanth genus, has been described from the Lower Lias at Lyme Regis (
Lyme Regis has also yielded type specimens of 14 species of reptiles, nine of which only occur there. The majority of the reptiles are the fish-eating marine forms, plesiosaurs and ichthyosaurs, but include a piscivorous pterosaur.
Comparison with other localities
The fauna recovered from the Lower Lias succession at Lyme Regis is unique in being so diverse and well preserved. A similar shark fauna has recently been recovered from the Lower Lias of Blockley Station Quarry (q.v.) and bony fish specimens were frequently recovered from the old brick pits at Barrow-on-Soar, Leicestershire; Barnstone, Nottinghamshire; and Street in Somerset (all Lower Hettangian; Hallam, 1968). Like those of Lyme Regis, their fossil fishes are similarly well preserved and have yielded some type material (Woodward, 1891a, 1901). The assemblages from Barrow-on-Soar have been particularly well studied (Brodie, 1857a, 1857b; Browne, 1889a; Fox-Strangways, 1903; Gardiner, 1960) and many species of fish and reptile show evidence of soft tissue preservation (Martin et al., 1986, and references therein). The same faunas were recovered from Barnstone in the 1930s: Kent (1937) considered the palaeoenvironment of the Lower Lias in the English Midlands to be nearshore marine, because of the abundance of insect and plant material in the sections at Barnstone and Barrow. However, all but a very few of the pits there are now infilled and no new finds have been recorded.
There is a rather scattered record of fish faunas of this age throughout the world, but mostly they occur in north-western Europe, Lombardy in Italy and in the south-western states of the USA as well as in the Newark Group of the American northeast (Schaeffer and Patterson, 1984). Elsewhere Lower Jurassic fishes are known in the Caribbean, Brazil and southeast Asia (Arratia and Viohl, 1995).
Conclusion
The Lyme Regis coast section of Lower Lias is one of the most important fish-bearing sites in Britain and has an internationally recognized status, hence its conservation value. It has yielded many type specimens, the remains of which are extremely well preserved, it still yields whole fish, and the only comparable site of the same age outside Britain is Ostenso, Italy. Historically, Lyme Regis is unique, and its potential for future finds is excellent.