Stephenson, D., Bevins, R.E., Millward, D., Highton, A.J., Parsons, I., Stone, P. & Wadsworth, W.J. 1999. Caledonian Igneous Rocks of Great Britain. Geological Conservation Review Series No. 17, JNCC, Peterborough, ISBN 1 86107 471 9. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Knockormal
P. Stone
Introduction
That part of the Ballantrae Complex ophiolite exposed between Knockormal and Carleton Mains farms spans an anastomosing fault zone trending NE–SW through the central of the three volcanic belts
The first extensive study of the Knockormal rocks was by Balsillie (1937) who identified the essential paradox; these are very high-grade metamorphic rocks requiring extremely high pressure for their formation, yet they are in close proximity to the extensive Ballantrae lava successions, which have experienced only very low-grade regional metamorphism. Balsillie's solution was to regard the high-grade rocks as relics of an ancient crystalline basement onto which the lavas were erupted, a controversial proposal at the time. However, a detailed study of mineralogy and mineral chemistry by Bloxam and Allen (1960) showed that the various glaucophane and other blue-amphibole rocks had been derived from spilitic lavas identical to those widely seen elsewhere in the Ballantrae Complex. Transitional lithologies were also discovered and an origin through in-situ faulting and shearing was favoured. The eclogite was also studied by Bloxam and Allen and described as a likely segregation within a host peridotite (now serpentinized), possibly forming as a primary component of a layered ultramafic body.
With the identification of the Ballantrae Complex as an obducted ophiolite, speculation was renewed and comparisons made with better exposed analogues elsewhere in the world. Church and Gayer (1973) introduced the possibility that all of the exotic lithologies at Knockormal could be contained within a large-scale, tectonized slump deposit formed during the obduction process. Bloxam (1980) suggested that the glaucophane schist could form tectonic inclusions contained within the serpentinite and derived from an older source, an echo of Balsillie's original proposal although differently effected. Nevertheless, it was the supposed association of eclogite with glaucophane schist and their joint implication of exceptionally high-pressure metamorphism that continued to attract most attention. Hence the inclusion of Ballantrae in that category on such regional compilations as the UNESCO-sponsored Metamorphic Map of Europe (Fettes, 1978). With this background the Knockormal GCR site is of great importance both for interpretations of the Ballantrae Complex itself and for assessments of its large-scale regional relationships.
Description
The general distribution of lithologies in the Knockormal area is shown in
The field relationships between the various ultramafic lithologies are uncertain but the contacts between the ultramafic rocks and the blueschists all appear to be faulted. The blueschists are disposed along the sheared and faulted margins of a complex tectonic lens, which contains dolerite and gabbro together with serpentinized ultramafic rock, wherlite and various pyroxenites including the 'eclogite'. The schistose foliation trends approximately parallel to the margins of the gabbro-ultramafic lens and appears to be consistent between outcrops. The schists have developed by progressive deformation of spilitic lavas which form the bulk of the outcrop in the Knockormal–Carleton Mains area. Locally, for example 400–500 m WSW from Knockormal farmhouse, the spilitic lavas are interbedded with black siliceous mudstone and recrystallized limestone. For the most part the schists are of the greenschist fades but in some examples wisps of pale-blue glaucophane and/or crossite appear, apparently as replacements of actinolite or chlorite; rarely these may develop into macroscopic blue bands of fibrous crossite. These lithologies have been referred to as 'transitional glaucophane schists' by Bloxam and Allen (1960) and are the most common blueschist lithology. True glaucophane schist is rare and is restricted to narrow zones within the drainage trench and exposures 'on the crags near the Lendalfoot road' as reported by Bloxam and Allen (1960). In these examples the glaucophane forms a continuous foliation, apparently replacing chlorite and enclosing grains of epidote, titanite and albite with rare garnet present in places. In hand specimen the glaucophane schist is a hard, blue-grey rock with a silky lustre. Crossite amphibolites are interbanded with the glaucophane schists and are generally coarser grained with the crossite forming ragged fringes around crystals of green hornblende. A comprehensive account of the mineralogy and mineral chemistry of the Knockormal blueschists is provided by Bloxam and Allen (1960). All of the schistose lithologies show evidence of refolding, cataclasis and brittle deformation subsequent to the formation of the blue amphiboles.
Ultramafic lithologies exposed in the Knockormal area include serpentinized harzbur-gite, wherlite and clinopyroxenite. However, it is the reported presence of eclogite which gives this locality its unique importance. The eclogite was first reported by Balsillie (1937), together with the blueschists, as 'some of the most interesting rocks that have yet been discovered in the Ballantrae region'. Bloxam and Allen (1960) made a detailed study of material taken from the probable erratic boulder and described it as essentially amphibole (pargasite), clinopyroxene (fassaite) and garnet with accessory green spinel (ceylonite) and possibly zoisite. Smellie and Stone (1984) examined material from the same source and confirmed the earlier description although without the accessory spinel. The nearby excavation of a comparable lithology (Trench 2,
Interpretation
The association of glaucophane schist and supposed eclogite has led to speculation that the Ballantrae Complex contains the remains of a high-pressure metamorphic belt (e.g. Fettes, 1978), with major implications for any interpretation of its origin. However, the ambiguous field relationships between the various lithologies and some unusual petrographical and chemical features have allowed the development of a number of alternative models.
The blueschist occurrences are all contained within an anastomosing fault zone and are marginal to a composite block of gabbro and ultramafic rock
The 'eclogite' has received even more attention than the blueschists and has generated a range of interpretations. These include: an ultramafic lens within serpentinized harzburgite (Bloxam and Allen, 1960), subsequently refined as a high-pressure phase of a layered peridotite sequence (Bloxam, 1980); part of a high-grade metamorphic belt (e.g. Fettes, 1978); a tectonically isolated sliver of a dismembered metamorphic sole to the ophiolite comparable to the in-situ examples seen at the Knocklaugh GCR site (Spray and Williams, 1980; Trcloar et al., 1980); an exotic clast derived from a mélange deposit (Church and Gayer, 1973) comparable, as with the blueschists, to fragments of garnet-clinopyroxene rock seen in other Ballantrae Complex mélanges. The detailed study by Smellie and Stone (1984) showed that the mineral paragenesis is consistent with an origin within the lowermost crust or upper mantle; the mineral chemistry is dissimilar to that of eclogites (sensu stricto) found in blueschist belts but is consistent with an ultramafic association. This led the latter authors to propose an origin as garnet pyroxenite formed by partial melting of a rising lherzolite diapir beneath an Arenig oceanic spreading centre. However, age dating by Hamilton et al. (1984) suggested that the Knockormal 'eclo-gite' is considerably older than Arenig (early Ordovician). Using material from the originally described crag/boulder (which they considered to be a clast within a mélange) these authors obtained a Sm-Nd garnet-pyroxene-whole rock isochron of 576 ± 32 Ma, about Early Cambrian. This is the oldest age yet determined for any component of the Ballantrae Complex and strengthens those interpretations that see the 'eclogite' as an exotic clast derived from preexisting oceanic crust.
Despite a plethora of research the origin and relationships of the Knockormal blueschist-'eclogite' assemblage remain uncertain. The current consensus favours an exotic origin as clasts within a mélange deposit but the relative importance of sedimentary versus tectonic processes has not been established and the ultimate origin(s) of the clasts (if that is what they are) remains unknown. However, it does seem clear that there is no genetic link between the blueschists and the 'eclogite' and their present juxtaposition must therefore be regarded as fortuitous.
Conclusions
The 'eclogite' and glaucophane schist (blue-schist) lithologies at Knockormal are internationally known as unusual components of the Ballantrae Complex. The 'eclogite' is most likely to have originated as a garnet(-hornblende) clinopyroxenite segregation within upper mantle harzburgite. It may now occur as a tectonic inclusion within serpentinite. It is the oldest rock so far identified within the complex (c. 576 Ma) and may represent a fragment of the oceanic crust which formed the basement to the younger (c. 500–490 Ma) components. The high-pressure blueschists occur at the sheared and faulted margins of a lensoid, composite block of gabbro and ultramafic lithologies that includes the 'eclogite'. Blueschist facies rocks appear to be transitional into lower-pressure greenschists derived from adjacent pillow lavas and there is continuity of the schistosity. Nevertheless, the blueschists are also widely considered to be exotic lithologies contained as blocks in a tectonized sedimentary slump deposit. Their ultimate origin is unclear but they may indicate a phase of subduction prior to the late-Arenig obduction of the Ballantrae Complex ophiolite. The combination of these unusual lithologies and the relationships between them, are among the most enigmatic problems in the interpretation of the ophiolite.