Rushton, A.W.A., Owen, A.W., Owens, R.M. & Prigmore, J.K. 2000. British Cambrian to Ordovician Stratigraphy. Geological Conservation Review Series No. 18, JNCC, Peterborough, ISBN 1 86107 4727. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Sholeshook
Introduction
Sholeshook railway cutting is of regional and national significance palaeontologically and biostratigraphically. It is the type section of the Sholeshook Limestone Formation of Cautleyan–Rawtheyan age, which has long been known for its diverse trilobite and echinoderm faunas. It is the type locality for many species of trilobites, a craniate brachiopod and several echinoderms (cystoids, pelmatozoans and a coronate).
The Sholeshook Limestone, like the Robeston Wathen, Birdshill and Crûg limestones (see site reports), is part of a series of early to mid-Ashgill carbonate or carbonate-rich developments that occur between Haverfordwest and Llandeilo. Each has its own distinct faunal and facies characteristics, and precise correlation between them is difficult. Most fall within the Cautleyan Stage, although the Sholeshook Limestone has been shown to extend upwards into the Rawtheyan (Price, 1980) and, probably, downwards into the Pusgillian (Zalasiewicz et al., 1995).
As with the other Ashgill limestones in southwest Wales, the Sholeshook Limestone was included by Murchison (1839, p. 397) within his Llandeilo Limestone and Flags division. Phillips (1848, p. 322) described the limestone as 'sub-calcareous and sandy beds, with Cystidea etc.', and in the appendix of the same work Salter described trilobite species. In the same year Forbes (1848) described several of the cystoids. The first detailed account of the site was by Marr and Roberts (1885, p. 480), who introduced the term 'Sholeshook Limestone' and listed the fossils present. Some trilobites and a brachiopod were described by Reed (1904, 1905, 1908), based on specimens from the Turnbull Collection in the Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge. Cantrill (in Strahan et al., 1914, pp. 59–64) presented the first detailed map of the railway cutting and adjacent area and gave a long faunal list. Marr (1907, p. 68) placed the Sholeshook Limestone at the base of his then newly proposed Ashgill Series, with the underlying Robeston Wathen Limestone at the top of the Caradoc. Many later authors (e.g. Whittington, 1965, p. 41) considered the age to be middle Ashgill, but in a series of papers on the stratigra- phy and trilobite faunas Price (1973a, 1974, 1977, 1980a,b) showed that the age at Sholeshook ranges from Cautleyan Zone 2 to Rawtheyan Zone 5. The cheirurid trilobites were redescribed by Lane (1971) and the important cystoid fauna by Paul (1973–1997), who described the succession at this locality and noted (1973, p. 4) that this is 'probably the richest site for cystoids in Britain'. Donovan and Paul (1985) described coronate blastozoan echinoderms, and Donovan (1986–95) described the pelmatozoan columnals.
Description
About 57 m of strata are exposed in the railway cutting
The lower half of the Sholeshook Limestone exposed in the railway cutting comprises beds of tough, compact, dark blue-grey limestone, ranging in thickness from 6 cm to 20 cm and separated by units of light blue-grey, thinly bedded, fissile calcareous siltstone ranging from 30 cm to more than 200 cm thick. The limestone horizons are extremely fine-grained and weather rusty-brown. The thicker of these beds have gently undulating upper and lower surfaces and are probably the developments of 'nodular limestones' referred to in earlier accounts. Higher in the succession, the beds above about 25 m from the base lack these 'nodular limestones', and the uppermost 3–4 m are more argillaceous, greenish and bioturbated. These latter beds are well seen in a small exposure just west of the north end of the railway cutting
Fossils occur throughout the Sholeshook Limestone Formation in the railway cutting, although both trilobites and cystoids are more diverse in the upper part of the sequence (Price, 1973a, table 2; Paul, 1973–1997, p. 6, text-fig. 5). Of the former, Tretaspis cf. radialis Lamont, Ceraurinella intermedia Kielan, Pseudosphaerexochus tectus Ingham, Encrinuroides sexcostatus (Salter), Atractopyge aff. scabra Dean, Flexicalymene cavei Price and Platylichas noctua Price are common throughout and are joined in the upper half by such taxa as Stenopareia bowmanni (Salter), Pseudosphaerexochus juvenis (Salter), Staurocephalus clavifrons Angelin and Calyptaulax planiformis Dean (Price, 1973a, 1980b). Paul (1973–1997) noted that, of the cystoids
Interpretation
On sedimentological and stratigraphical evidence, Price (1980b, p. 882) suggested that the Sholeshook Limestone Formation probably represents an environment in the middle to upper part of the slope, between the platform edge and basin. The association of trilobite genera, with elements of deeper-water mudstones and shallow-water carbonate accumulations, supports this conclusion. The sediments are predominantly clastic but with some carbonate content. A high proportion of the trilobites are disarticu-lated, and the cystoids (Donovan et al., in Harper and Owen, 1996, p. 202) have lost their stems and brachioles. With sedimentological evidence, this suggests deposition under relatively high-energy conditions. However, Paul (19731997, p. 29) inferred that conditions just below the water-sediment interface were at times anaerobic.
The trilobite fauna shows greatest similarity to that of the Cautleyan parts of the Cautley Mudstones in northern England, with a large number of species in common (Price, 1980b, p. 881), making precise correlation possible. Of these, species of the trinucleid trilobite Tretaspis have been particularly important in establishing the age of the Sholeshook Limestone (Price, 1973a, p. 238; Zalasiewicz et al., 1995, p. 615), the base apparently being diachronous, with a possible Pusgillian age established at Whitland, a Cautleyan Zone 1 age at Llanddowror, and Cautleyan Zone 2 at Sholeshook. The mid-Cautleyan age of the middle part of the succession at Sholeshook is supported by the presence of Orthograptus abbreviatus Elles and Wood, which is suggestive of an anceps Biozone age (Zalasiewicz et al., 1995, p. 615). Revision of Tretaspis species by Price (1977) demonstrated that the top of the formation extends into the Rawtheyan Stage, Zone 5 (Price, 1980a), and the diagnostic subspecies Tretaspis hadelandica brachystichus Ingham was reported from several localities, including from the quarry downstream of the bridge at Sholeshook (Price, 1973a, loc. 9d, see above), and from Robeston Wathen (see site report). The limestone at Sholeshook itself apparently does not extend downwards into horizons with Tretaspis moeldenensis moeldenensis Cave, but these are seen at Mylet Road (see site report) and in the Whitland section (Zalasiewicz et al., 1995, p. 615).
Conclusions
Sholeshook is an important locality regionally and nationally, being the type locality of the Sholeshook Limestone. This formation is stratigraphically and palaeontologically the most important of the Ashgill limestones in South Wales; it is the type stratum for several species of trilobites and cystoid echinoderms, including species of stratigraphical value.