Emeleus, C.H. & Gyopari, M.C. 1992. British Tertiary Volcanic Province, Geological Conservation Review Series No. 4. JNCC, Peterborough, ISBN 0 412 47980 X. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Langbaurgh Ridge and Cliff Ridge
Highlights
The dyke is the most laterally extensive and best exposed member of the Tertiary swarm of northeast England. It shows remarkable chemical uniformity and is compositionally identical with rocks in Mull. Calculations suggest that it was emplaced by rapid lateral flow over a period of as little as 1–5 days, from a source beneath Mull.
Introduction
The Tertiary Cleveland Dyke cuts and indurates Jurassic sediments in the Langbaurgh and Cliff Ridges close to the village of Great Ayton, on the border of Cleveland and North Yorkshire
Early descriptions of the dyke include those of Tate and Blake (1876) and Barrow (1888) who also described the petrography. Petrographic descriptions were also given by Teall (1884, who cited an analysis by Stock) and by Holmes and Harwood (1929). Numerous chemical analyses were made by Hornung et al. (1966). MacDonald et al. (1988) have modelled emplacement of the dyke.
Description
The Cleveland Dyke is the southernmost member of a swarm of east–west to WNW–ESE-trending tholeiite (quartz dolerite) dykes in north-east England which focus on the Mull Tertiary central complex
The dyke is up to 25 m in width and appears to have produced little alteration of the sediments apart from discoloration and induration for a distance of about 2 m from the contact. Its course across country is readily observed since its en échelon segments form elongate, low ridges; the effect is well seen when Langbaurgh Ridge is viewed from Cliff Ridge (Locality 3,
Interpretation
The dyke was the subject of early attempts to date rocks using radiometric techniques when Dubey and Holmes (1929) demonstrated that it was younger than the (Stephanian) Whin dolerites of north-east England. Subsequently, the Palaeocene age of the Cleveland Dyke was confirmed when a date of c 58 Ma was obtained by the K–Ar method (Evans et al., 1973) and by its magnetic properties (for example, Dagley, 1969).
It is demonstrably post Jurassic and the clear connection with the Mull central complex also supports a Palaeocene age.
There has been debate whether the dyke was actually fed from a source in Mull, or rose vertically from subjacent mantle along a fracture system propagated from Mull. The considerable distance from Mull (c. 370 km) and the absence of any systematic increase in thermal metamorphism around the dyke when traced towards Mull have perhaps supported the suggestion that the magma rose vertically, but this does require a laterally extensive magma source beneath the dyke over its entire extent, for which there is little evidence (MacDonald et al., 1988). MacDonald et al, have made a detailed examination of the petrology of the dyke which substantiates the earlier claims that it is extremely similar compositionally to some of the Mull non-por-phyritic central magma-type intrusions. They have also carried out numerical modelling of the flow of magma through a dyke of this size from which they conclude that the dyke could have been fed by lateral flow from a large magma chamber beneath Mull, and that its emplacement could have taken place in the very short time of 1–5 days.
Conclusions
The Cleveland Dyke is a compositionally uniform quartz dolerite which closely resembles basaltic and doleritic rocks in the Mull central complex. It is a compact, fine-grained rock with scattered, small, plagioclase crystals and small vesicles. As it is the only durable rock in North Yorkshire and Teeside it has been extensively quarried and mined for aggregate.
Recent research has shown that the dyke was probably intruded laterally from a source beneath the Isle of Mull in western Scotland, and that lateral emplacement may have taken place in a few days.