Mortimore, R.N., Wood, C.J. & Gallois, R.W. 2001. British Upper Cretaceous Stratigraphy. Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 23, JNCC, Peterborough. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Whitecliff, Isle of Wight
Introduction
Whitecliff, Isle of Wight, is an extraordinary site, forming a continuous north–south dip section exposing some 300 m of Chalk from the Upper Turonian Substage at 'The Nostrils' at the southern end, to the Upper Campanian Substage beneath the Palaeogene unconformity at the northern end
Description
The Whitecliff section falls completely within Barrois' Craie Blanche' (White Chalk), which he subdivided into four macrofossil assemblage zones (Barrois, 1875). In Reid and Strahan's (1889) account of the geology of the Isle of Wight, the Whitecliff section is, surprisingly, not mentioned. This omission contrasts with the measured section given for the Lower and Middle Chalk in the adjacent Culver Cliff. Jukes-Browne and Hill (1904, p. 93) made only one reference to the Whitecliff section (calling it 'Culver Cliff '). They recorded an observation made by Whitaker (1865c) on the so-called 'flintless belt' with its single tabular (sheet-) flint band and four green-coated nodular beds, from which Whitaker obtained the echinoid Offaster pilula (Lamarck).
It was left to Rowe (1908) to provide the first full account of this wonderful section. He divided the exposures into three; the 'Southern cliff', 'Eastern cliff' and, on the northern side, his 'White Cliff proper'. However, due to the numerous cliff falls and the seaweed and algal slime-coated faces, he found measuring the section and the collection of fossils particularly difficult. Nevertheless, he recognized the zonal divisions and was the first to record the Uintacrinus socialis and Marsupites testudinarius zones here.
Later researchers have concentrated on particular parts of the stratigraphy. Mortimore (1979, 1986a,b) used the section above Whitaker's 'Flintless Belt' as the standard for his Culver Chalk Formation (originally the 'Culver Chalk Member'). This formation is now divided into the Tarrant and Spetisbury Chalk members (Bristow et al., 1997; Rawson et al., 2001). Mortimore also used this section as a standard for the boundary between his Culver and Portsdown Chalk members. The Flintless Belt, named the Whitecliff Member' by Gale et al. (1988), was illustrated in detail by Mortimore and Pomerol (1997, fig. 9) as part of their study of tectonic influences on Chalk sedimentation. A detailed log of the section from the Flintless Belt up to the top of the Chalk was provided by Gale (in Jenkyns et al., 1994, fig. 15).
Key features in the lower part of this huge section
In the centre of the section there is a bluff of harder, almost flintless chalk in the Lower Campanian Newhaven Chalk Formation, the so-called 'Flintless Belt'
A second bluff at the northern end of the section is created by the Portsdown Chalk Formation with numerous marl seams, the marls forming grooves in the cliff. Within the Portsdown Chalk there are special marker beds, including the Isle of Wight Tubular Flints (
Lithostratigraphy
The base of the Lewes Nodular Chalk Formation is found on the cliffs between Whitecliff Ledge and The Nostrils
On the far side of this headland there is a small bay that extends up to the bluffs formed by the Flintless Belt. In the southern corner of this bay there is a second fault on a marl seam, the White Horse Marl (new name herein), which is in the 'Barren Beds' of the Seaford Chalk Formation
The Flintless Belt is not entirely flintless since it contains several bands of small finger-flints as well as sheet-flints
Within the Culver Chalk Formation there are four groups of marls, the Lancing, Solent, Whitecliff and Yaverland marls
The Portsdown Chalk Formation, with many marl seams, forms the next bluff in the cliff and the foreshore reef
Biostratigraphy
As Rowe (1908) realized, collecting well-preserved fossils is difficult in this section. Despite this, all of the key marker inoceramid bivalves and shape changes in Echinocorys have either been collected or observed in place. Combined with the details given in Rowe (1908), a fairly complete picture of the biostratigraphy can be constructed.
The terminal Turonian–basal Coniacian inoceramid bivalve Cremnoceramus waitersdorfensis (Andert), associated with Micraster normanniae Bucaille are abundant in the beds below and in the Cliffe Hardground. The highly reduced section between the Hope Gap Hardground and the Shoreham Marl has not provided definite evidence of C. crassus crassus (Petrascheck), which occurs elsewhere in this interval. The beds immediately above the Shoreham Marl have also not yielded any diagnostic fossils. The presumed correlatives of the Belle Tout Marls and Seven Sisters Flint Band contain layers with abundant Platyceramus and Volviceramus. The overlying 'Barren Beds', up to the basal Santonian Cladoceramus undulatoplicatus beds, are, as their name implies, devoid of obvious macrofossils.
The higher Santonian fauna is more abundant, comprising many inoceramid shell debris beds and bands of the conical echinoid Conulus albogalerus Leske, as well as a rich mesofauna of crinoid (Bourgueticrinus) and asteroid ossicles. The lowest Uintacrinus socialis specimen so far located is associated with the beds with many stylolitic marl seams, but the exact base of its zone remains to be determined. Similarly, the base of the Marsupites Zone is only provisionally located, but the upper limit of the zonal index fossil at the top of the first hardground within the base of the Flintless Belt is supported by Rowe's (1908, p. 244) observations.
Within the Flintless Belt, fossils are fairly common, and the typical forms of Echinocorys in the Lower Campanian Offaster pilula and Gonioteuthis quadrata zones (see Newhaven to Brighton GCR site report, this volume) have been identified
The base of the Upper Campanian B. mucronata Zone (sensu stricto) is taken at the entry of marl seams with abundant inoceramid bivalves, including Cataceramus dariensis (Dobrov and Pavlova). These are conspicuous in this section. In the overlying succession, an interval with Echinocorys subconicula Brydone is followed by an interval with E. conica (Agassiz)
Interpretation
There are very few sections as complete and accessible as Whitecliff. It is, however, anomalous in several respects (Mortimore, 1986a). The beds in the upper Lewes Nodular Chalk Formation, including the interval from the Hope Gap Hardground to the Shoreham Marl (Lower Coniacian) are attenuated, and overlain by an expanded basal part of the Seaford Chalk Formation. Hardgrounds at the top of the Seaford Chalk Formation (Lower Santonian Substage) are followed by beds with numerous stylolitic marl seams. The so-called 'Flintless Belt' is a condensed section from the top of the Upper Santonian Marsupites Zone to the top of the Lower Campanian 0. pilula Zone; the individual hardgrounds within this interval correspond to horizons with similar surfaces elsewhere (e.g. Windmill Hill, Hampshire, and Stoughton, Sussex, Mortimore, 1986b). These hardgrounds are not a general feature, but are always located along or close to known tectonic lines (see below). Higher in the Campanian succession, many of the flints in the Culver Chalk Formation, and some in the Portsdown Chalk Formation, show evidence of synsedimentary movements, but only at particular horizons.
Other research on the geochemistry and the Cretaceous palaeomagnetic reversal timescale for the 'Whitecliff section (Barchi, 1995) has identified the reversal from magnetochron 34N to 34R beneath the Old Nore Marl within the Flintless Belt. Geochemical spikes, linked to lithological and fossil event beds, provide evidence for palaeoceanographic and climatic changes in the Late Cretaceous Epoch in this section.
Whitecliff provides the standard stable isotope curves (δ13C, δ18O) for the Culver Chalk, Portsdown Chalk and basal Studland Chalk formations (Jenkyns et al., 1994, fig. 7). As in the case of the curves for the underlying succession (higher Seaford Chalk, Newhaven Chalk and basal Culver Chalk formations) at Cuckmere to Seaford, the curves show a remarkable degree of covariance, suggesting that the isotope values have been affected by diagenetic processes. There is a conspicuous pair of closely-spaced 'spikes' of negative values corresponding to the marl seams at the base of the Portsdown Chalk and the paired marl seams rich in inoceramid bivalve shell debris, 5 m above, respectively.
Small pits along the Chalk Downs forming the spine of the Isle of Wight, because of their weathered state, often yield better-preserved fossils that support the identification of beds at Whitecliff. Arreton Down Pit
Other important sections on the Isle of Wight include the difficult to access Scratchell's Bay
The higher beds at Scratchell's Bay in the Culver Chalk Formation contain a phosphatic chalk horizon (Bailey et al., 1983, fig. 3) which was tentatively correlated with the Downend Main Hardground phosphates (see Downend Chalk Pit GCR site report, this volume). In addition, the Scratchell's Bay section was used as a standard for the Campanian microfossil biostratigraphy (Swiecicki, in Bailey et al., 1983). Extrapolation of this scheme to the mainland required correlation of key marker beds such as the Whitecliff and Portsdown marls from Whitecliff to Scratchell's Bay and to the Shide Pit
Alum Bay exposes beds higher than those preserved at Whitecliff. Tectonically, Alum Bay is down the plunge east to west which continues westward to Handfast Point–Studland Bay, Dorset, and the Chalk 'youngs' in that direction. The higher beds at Alum Bay are above the Portsdown Chalk Formation in the marl-free Alum Bay Beds of Mortimore (1979, 1983; Studland Chalk Member, Gale et al., 1988). These beds contain several conspicuous, marker flint bands.
Conclusions
Whitecliff is unique in the extent and accessibility of the stratigraphy (including stable isotope stratigraphy and magnetostratigraphy) exposed in one continuous Chalk section and it additionally provides vital evidence for sedimentary processes and tectonic control of sedimentation in the Coniacian to Campanian Chalk of the Southern Province.