Benton, M.J., Cook, E. & Turner, P. 2002. Permian and Triassic Red Beds and the Penarth Group of Great Britain. Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 24, JNCC, Peterborough, ISBN 1 86 107 493 X. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Pinhay Bay, Devon
Introduction
Pinhay Bay, near Lyme Regis, exposes a sequence of Triassic and Jurassic rocks including the Cotham and Langport members of the Lilstock Formation (Penarth Group) and the overlying Pre-planorbis and Hettangian beds of the Blue Lias. The site offers the best single exposure for the Langport Member in a thick development and shows diverse evidence of sedimentology and tectonic modification. The Langport Member is a regionally important unit, that is better-developed here than in sites farther north.
Pinhay Bay has not been extensively studied. Richardson (1906) includes a very brief mention of the site, as do Jukes-Brown (1902), Woodward and Young (1906), Woodward and Ussher (1906), Lang (1924), Sellwood et al. (1970), House (1989), Hesselbo and Jenkyns (1995) and Wignall (2001). Hallam (1960) wrote the classic account of the Pinhay Bay Langport Member.
Description
Pinhay Bay is also known as 'Pinney Bay' (Woodward and Ussher, 1906; Lang, 1924). The section is approximately 2.5 km west of Lyme Regis; it forms part of the Axmouth to Lyme Regis Undercliffs National Nature Reserve, and is included in the Dorset and East Devon Coast World Heritage Site, established December 2001. The cliffs and foreshore at Pinhay Bay are easily accessible, but are occasionally obscured by landslides and slumps.
Sedimentology
The cliffs and foreshore at Pinhay Bay expose beds of Late Triassic and Early Jurassic age. At the western end, the Blue Lias is brought into contact with the older Penarth Group by a fault (House, 1989). The following section is taken from Hallam (1960, pp. 48ā9), with additional information from Richardson (1906, pp. 407ā8), Hamilton (1961), Ager and Smith (1965, p.12), and House (1989):
Thickness (m) | |
Lias Group: Blue Lias: | |
Alternations of thin limestones and calcareous shales. Including the Pre-planorbis Beds (lowest 2.5 m) | |
Penarth Group | |
Lilstock Formation: Langport Member: | |
'Sun Bed': limestone, locally a conglomerate with limestone pebbles in a manly matrix; thickens locally | 0.05 |
Thin limestones with slightly irregular surfaces and partings of brown marl; some are rubbly or have perforated upper surfaces | 0.41 |
Limestone, locally with an irregular upper surface: occurs only in east; replaced westwards by several thin limestones | 0.25 |
Thin, rubbly limestones with irregular marl partings; shelly band near top | 0.23 |
Shelly marl with lenses of limestone | 0.02 |
Limestone, locally porcellanous, with eroded top | 0.11 |
Main Slump Bed | 1.37 |
Porcellanous limestone | 0.05 |
Thin, rubbly limestones with irregular marl partings and pockets of small bivalves | 0.86 |
Limestone with irregular base | 0.20 |
Limestone, locally with a rubbly top, containing numerous subangular fragments of porcellanous limestone; minor slump structures | 1.37 |
Thin limestones | 0.51 |
Limestone with minor slump structures and locally a porcellanous top | 0.58 |
Thin limestone locally becoming porcellanous and rubbly, with slightly irregular surfaces and partings of marl up to 0.01 m thick; rare pockets of small bivalves | 1.83 |
Lilstock Formation: Cotham Member: | |
Including the Cotham Marble, the 'Estheria Bed', and black shales Westbury Formation: | 1.5 |
'Contorta' Shales | 5.0 |
The Langport Member limestones seen at Pinhay Bay
The rubbly limestone
Slump structures are especially well-developed in the 'Slump Bed'
At the base of the sequence, and exposed on the foreshore at low tides, is the Cotham Member. This was described very briefly by Richardson (1906), who recorded little more than the presence of the Cotham Marble, the 'Estheria Bed' and the shales. The Cotham Marble recorded had the 'landscape' form; and the 'Estheria Bed' was described as a pale limestone containing concretions and Estheria minuta. Mayall (1983) reported that a deformed bed from the middle of the Cotham Member is poorly exposed at Pinhay Bay, and that it can be correlated with the section at nearby Culverhole Point. This bed is approximately 0.4 m thick and consists of a calcitic mudstone with ripples, lens es of silty material, and evidence for sediment deformation, interpreted as possibly reflecting contemporary seismic activity.
Structural geology
The dominant structural feature at Pinhay Bay is the fault picked out by a small stream and with the Blue Lias downthrown to the west against the Langport Member (Woodward and Ussher, 1906; Lang, 1924; House, 1989). Hallam (1960) described small-scale faults that cut through the Langport Member and extend into the Blue Lias, where they plastically deform the Lower Jurassic beds.
Palaeontology
The Cotham Member has yielded a number of fossils. Of particular note are the well-developed algal mounds and mats that form the 'Landscape Marble' (Hamilton, 1961). Also present (Richardson, 1906) are remains of the crustacean Estheria minuta. Palynomorphs have been recovered from this unit in the nearby Lyme Regis borehole (Warrington, 1997a).
The Langport Member has yielded a diverse fossil assemblage, including many invertebrate taxa and ichnotaxa. A full listing the fauna was given by Hallam (1960, pp. 54ā6). Many of the beds contain an assemblage composed of bivalves and gastropods with rarer solitary corals, which occur in dense concentrations approximately 1 m across and a few centimetres deep in the thinly bedded limestones. The shelly-marl horizon, seen towards the top of the exposure, contains abundant oysters and the bivalve Modiolus scattered throughout the sediment. Trace fossils include burrows and borings, for example the U-shaped tubes of Rhizocorallium, especially well exposed on the foreshore, where truncation has removed the top few centimetres of the burrows. Microfloras from a nearby section were documented by Orkell (1973) and Warrington (1997a)
Interpretation
The Cotham Member beds at Pinhay Bay represent a lagoonal environment. The sedimentary structures seen in this facies support this conclusion; for example the 'Landscape Marble' forms masses and mounds that were produced by algal mats growing in an intertidal environment (Hamilton, 1961).
The overlying Langport Member has been interpreted as representing an environment characterized by warm, shallow shelf lagoons, with periods of emergence (Hallam, 1960; Wignall, 2001). For example, the desiccation cracks and mud flake conglomerate of the 'Sun Bed', seen at the top of the section, are characteristic of temporary exposure and the associated drying out of the sediment surface. Hallam (1960) also presented evidence that these sediments were subjected to changes in relative sea level in the rapid lithification or consolidation of the limestones, for example intraformational conglomerates, burrows, and borings. The limestones were hardened during periods of exposure, and sedimentation resumed when the land was submerged again. Hallam (1960) estimated that there had been some 60 cycles of this nature at Pinhay Bay (see also Hesselbo and Jenkyns, 1995).
The sedimentary structures seen in the main slump bed have been interpreted as indicating high levels of disturbance on the sea bed. Consolidated brittle limestones were broken into angular fragments, rather than plastically deformed. The mass flow incorporated parts of the underlying porcellanous limestone into the debris flow. The intraformational breccia may have formed in a three-phase process (Wignall, 2001): (1) formation of a hardground that was lithified and bored; (2) local erosion of the hard-ground under a shallow sea to produce the conglomerate which was itself lithified; and (3) subaerial emergence and production of a fissured and pitted top surface. At nearby Charton Bay the equivalent bed is dominated by fractured sediments, showing that the sea floor there was at least partially lithified (Hallam, 1960).
There are certain similarities between the main slump bed at Pinhay Bay and a deformed bed seen in the Cotham Member of the Lilstock Formation. The Cotham Member deformed bed is characterized by microfaults, water-escape structures, and folds. Mayall (1983) considered this bed to have been initially deposited under shallow water conditions. Tectonic activity caused the unconsolidated silty beds to liquefy and the more consolidated sediments to fracture.
Conclusions
Pinhay Bay shows an excellent exposure of Upper Triassic and Lower Jurassic sediments. The Penarth Group strata include the Cotham and Langport Members of the Lilstock Formation. Several of the limestone beds of the Langport Member display excellent examples of soft-sediment deformation associated with debris flows, probably initiated by earthquakes or other tectonic activity. The site is especially important for evidence for ancient palaeoenvironments and critical in reconstructing the palaeogeography of southern England, near the end of Triassic time.