May, V.J. & Hansom, J.D. 2003. Coastal Geomorphology of Great Britain, Geological Conservation Review Series No. 28. JNCC, Peterborough, ISBN 1 86107 4840. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Dungeness and Rye Harbour, Kent and East Sussex
V.J. May
Introduction
The large shingle cuspate foreland of Dungeness and the associated beaches at Rye (see
Although the development of the features at Rye, Camber, Dungeness, Romney and Hythe are interrelated, they form separate physiographic units. Eddison (1983a,b) summarized the main phases of the evolution of the barrier beaches, expanding upon the detailed surveys carried out during the 1930s by Lewis (1932, 1937), byLewis and Balchin (1940), and by Lovegrove (1953) for Camber, and the Soil Survey of England and Wales (Green, 1968) for Romney Marsh during the 1950s and 1960s. This wider view is necessary for an understanding of the development of Dungeness and Rye Harbour.
The idea that there had been a former continuous beach from Fairlight to Hythe was suggested during the early 19th century by Elliott (1847), but later Gulliver (1897) and then Lewis (1932, 1937) attempted to explain the gradual development of the barrier beach into the cuspate foreland of today. Longshore transport processes brought flint from the west where very large volumes may have been deposited during the Pleistocene Epoch on the floor of the English Channel to be carried towards the present-day shoreline by the waves of the rising Holocene sea (Eddison, 1983a). Some of this shingle was trapped in the Pevensey embayment, but much of it accumulated to the east of Hastings. As the western part of the barrier beach weakened, shingle was re-distributed to more eastern beaches. The beach is thought to have gradually changed its alignment towards the predominantly south-westerly up-Channel waves (Lewis, 1931).
Eddison (1983a,b) suggested that the earliest features, a submerged forest at Cliff End and the low-lying shingle deposits at Broomhill and Sandylands, represent an early barrier beach, probably dating from between 5500 and 4000 years BP The barrier progressively extended towards Hythe by a series of recurves, identified by Elliott (1847). Thus with the shingle emplaced dose to the present-day sea level, longshore transport gradually moved much of the shingle into the Romney embayment. The eastern end of the barrier beach extended towards, but never joined, the former cliffs around Lympne, so providing shelter for both Roman and Saxon vessels approaching the fort at Lympne, a site now about 3 km from the coastline.
Between Jury's Gap
During a series of 13th century storms, the shingle ridges at Camber were destroyed. At this stage, the developing ness was isolated from the beaches to its west. Subsequently, shingle ridges grew north-eastwards from the area to the south of Winchelsea and westwards from Broomhill to enclose the wide estuary of the River Rother. The Camber Castle group of ridges fan out, changing their alignment through about 50°, whereas at Camber Sands, on the northern side of the River Rother, a series of narrow ridges, including short distal recurves, extended westwards from the shoreline at Broomhill (see
By the mid-17th century, it is probable that the present-day pattern of longshore sediment movement was established. Shingle moved towards the mouth of the Rother from Fairlight to its west and Broomhill to its east, from Broomhill along the southern shoreline of Dungeness to the ness itself and thence northwards to Greatstone, and from St Mary's Bay southwards towards Littlestone. At Hythe, shingle moved eastwards towards the Lympne inlet, as appears always to have been the case. Much of the barrier beach at Romney has been built upon and the ridges at Hythe retain little of their original form. The modern shoreline is reinforced by sea-walls at Winchelsea Beach, Broomhill, Littlestone and Dymchurch, with artificial beach feeding at Cliff End, Jury's Gap, the Dungeness power station and St Mary's Bay, with over 110 000 m3 of material being added in 1979 (Eddison, 1983a), mostly by re-distribution from within the site. Nevertheless the southern shoreline continues to be eroded and shingle added to the eastern shoreline, the landward movement of the southern shoreline often taking place in stormy periods when it may move several tens of metres inland.
The present-day features of Dungeness and the associated beaches at Rye, Romney and Hythe thus result from changing sediment transport rates and deposition over some 5000 years, the different alignments of the shingle ridges and the buried beach ridges demonstrating gradual development from a barrier beach to the present artificially strengthened and nourished cuspate foreland.