May, V.J. & Hansom, J.D. 2003. Coastal Geomorphology of Great Britain, Geological Conservation Review Series No. 28. JNCC, Peterborough, ISBN 1 86107 4840. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Spey Bay, Moray
J.D. Hansom
Introduction
Spey Bay (see
The GCR boundary follows the Spey Bay SSSI boundary along mean low-water springs
Description
As already noted in the description of the Whiteness Head GCR site above, the Moray Firth is landlocked except between north and east and so north-easterly waves dominate and their oblique incidence produces a westerly movement of sediments. Erosion of the coast is at its most severe under northerly and north-easterly storms. For further details on waves, tides and general sea-level changes, see site GCR report for Whiteness Head (present chapter).
Spey Bay lies on the southern shore of the Moray Firth and extends for a distance of c. 16 km between rock headlands at Lossie-mouth in the west and Porttannachy/Portgordon in the east
West of the Speymouth delta, close to the Ministry of Defence firing range, several low altitude vegetated ridges are truncated by the present gravel beach, and curve gently landwards. These low altitude recurves occur continuously from this point to the westward extent of the gravel beach beyond Boar's Head Rock and become higher and more prominent westwards. West of Boar's Head Rock up to five well-defined gravel ridges curve gently landwards from the rear of the present-day active ridge. In the west, the ridges reach c. 6 m and stand up to 2 m above the adjacent intervening troughs. To landward, the ridges are sparsely vegetated by mosses and grasses and are eventually buried by high sand dunes and forest. The full landward extent of ridges is known to be substantial, continuing into the Spynie area to the south of Lossiemouth and as far west as Burghead Bay (Gemmell et al., 2001a,b). Within Spey Bay, the junction between these younger, more recently deposited ridges and the ridges of the emerged gravel strandplain, is marked by a 1–2 m rise in altitude and a distinct break in slope, best seen 2–3 km east of Kingston.
Time period | Westerly growth (m) | Growth per annum (m a−1) |
1870–1903 | 1360 | 41 |
1903–1967 | 2090 | 33 |
1967–1994 | 720 | 27 |
July 1994–December 1995 | 30 | 20 |
1870–1995 | 4200 | 34 |
On the seaward face of the gravel beaches, cusp forms of different wavelengths are well developed, the size and spacing of these ephemeral features altering in response to short-term processes that vary with wave and tidal conditions. Beach-face slope angles, the degree of sediment sorting and crest elevations also alter in response to wave and tidal conditions. Sediment sorting is well developed down the beach face, with finer-grained, well-sorted gravel lying in the intertidal zone whereas larger calibre, but more poorly sorted, gravel, occurs at or above high-water mark or in the horns of the cusps. However, there is no obvious alongshore trend in beach sediment size, until the abrupt transition from gravel to sand close to Lossiemouth. The median grain size of the gravel varies from 30 mm to 50 mm along the beach, whereas the sand has a median grain size of 0.22 mm (Gemmell, 2000; Gemmell et al., 2001b).
Along much of its length, the gravel ridge is subject to washover during storms and at several places washover throats occur in the main gravel ridge that allow coarse gravel lobes to accumulate landwards of the main ridge. This roll-over effect is widespread along the coast. Gravel is also being moved westwards under the influence of westerly waves. According to Grove (1955) 'the most recent gravel bank on the west side [of Spey Bay] appears to have grown steadily along the beach towards Lossiemouth over a distance of one and half miles (2.4 km) since 1870' at an average rate of westerly extension comparable with that of the gravel spits that grow across Spey mouth (Grove, 1955). Using map and field evidence the total westerly extension of the gravel beach was 4.2 km between 1870 and 1995, an average annual extension rate of 33.6 m a−1 (Gemmell et al., 2001a,b;
Changes in the position of mean high-water springs (MHWS) and MLWS at Spey Bay between the first (1870) and the latest current Ordnance Survey (1970) reveal that the eastern side of Spey Bay has been eroded over the intervening 100-year period. This erosional trend declines to the west beyond the Spey delta until it gives way to accretion c. 4 km west of the delta (Gemmell et al., 2001a,b). Recession rates since 1975 of 1–1.5 m a−1 have been recorded both east and west of the river exit (Riddell and Fuller, 1995). The replacement of sand by gravel, discussed above, is reflected by accretion over the 1870–1970 period in the west of Spey Bay along a 4 km stretch in the vicinity of Boar's Head Rock. Farther west, the sandy beach and dunes at Lossiemouth are wholly erosional over the map period, a trend which continues today (Gemmell et al., 2001a).
At the mouth of the Spey, complex fluvial and coastal processes interact to create a dynamic and highly active system
Changes in the position of the river mouth between 1726 and 1995, documented in Gemmell et al. (2001a,b) show a natural tendency for the river mouth to shift westwards towards Kingston, driven by the wave-driven westward migration of the spit across the mouth. If this natural process is uninterrupted, the mouth migrates by up to 1.2 km west of its 'central' (c. 200 m west of Tugnet) position. According to local tradition the Speymouth spit was c. 5 km long in 1798 (Hamilton, 1965). The river has always returned to a central location through natural breaches of the gravel spit, as recorded in 1829 and 1981 (Riddell and Fuller, 1995), but recent breaches have been artificially engineered to a 'central' location in order to reduce the threat of flooding and erosion at Kingston. In spite of this, there are also several documented examples (e.g. 1870, 1989 and 1995) of temporary easterly drift at Speymouth, which, although generally short-lived, demonstrate the sensitivity of the longshore drift system to local variations in the wind and wave climate. A complex suite of gravel ridges is present both to the east and west of the Spey outlet, enclosing tidal lagoons. The orientations and recurves of these ridges relate to the interaction of coastal and fluvial processes during the varying positions of the river over time, allowing former positions of the Spey mouth to be identified.
As a result of the erosional nature of much of Spey Bay protection measures have been implemented, mainly in the east. A vertical sea-wall fronts the village of Porttannachy/Portgordon in the east, a 400 m-long section of rip-rap backs the beach immediately to the east of the river mouth at Tugnet and a programme of beach replenishment using gravel excavated from the ridges at the delta mouth has recently been implemented along a 2 km stretch at Kingston (Gemmell et al., 2001a,b).
Interpretation
The contemporary coastal development of Spey Bay is juxtaposed against a fine suite of older emerged Holocene landforms and provides a unique site for the study of former sea levels and how these relate to both past and contemporary sediment budgets. In the UK context, Spey Bay also provides a unique insight into the under-researched area of deltaic processes that occur as a large gravel-bed river exits into a highly dynamic open coast situation.
Ogilvie (1923) provided the first interpretation of the gravel strandplain of Spey Bay in its wider regional and Holocene context, although the most recent and detailed work is that of Riddell and Fuller (1995), Gemmell (2000), and Gemmell et al. (2001a,b). Initial emplacement of the Spey Bay ridges against the foot of the Holocene cliff probably began before the peak of the Holocene Transgression (c. 6500 years BP), when rising sea levels delivered large quantities of offshore material to the coast. Together with River Spey gravels, this material infilled the low and flooded areas south of the present-day coast in the area of the Moor of Dallachy, almost as far as Fochabers upriver and to the south of Kingston along the foot of Binn Hill (Gemmell et al. 2001a,b;
There remains great potential for further research at this site and elsewhere on the Moray Firth to produce a quantified Holocene sediment budget for the Firth. For example, research at Culbin c. 40 km west of the Spey (see GCR site report for Culbin, Chapter 10) recognized the Holocene contribution of sediment from the River Spey and Findhorn to the development of the large gravel ridge strandplain at Culbin (Comber, 1993).
Contemporary coastal processes and land-forms are dominated by a strong westerly movement of gravels and truncation of the gravel recurves in west Spey Bay by the present-day beach suggests that the preceding generations of gravel ridges were subject to similar driving forces. However, since the older ridges were probably deposited along a coastline that trended along a west-east axis, rather than the present-day WNW–ESE, there is a strong suggestion of long-term erosion and planimetric readjustment of this part of Spey Bay (Hansom and Black, 1996). These recurves were also noted by Ritchie (1983) who posed the question of '...whether or not the present beach ridge is another gravel beach ridge that continues the pattern of progradational ridges or, as is more likely, it is largely a product of the reworking of the front of one of the ridges of the emerged gravel foreland'. The suggestion from both Ritchie (1983) and Hansom and Black (1996) is that while the eastern part of Spey Bay is eroded and rotates landwards, it fuels a seawards rotation of the west Spey Bay gravel ridges.
Gemmell (2000) and Gemmell et al. (2001a,b) produced a preliminary contemporary sediment budget for Spey Bay
The above sediment budget, although preliminary and under revision, is instructive because it supports the geomorphological evidence and indicates that the entire length of Spey Bay functions as a discrete sedimentary unit, with erosion of one section influencing accretion at another. However, the supply of gravel alongshore is not constant and is subject to pulsing depending upon fluvial supply and storm events (Gemmell et al., 2001a). Further, since sediment supply from the offshore to Scottish coasts is now much diminished, the supply to the Spey system is no longer added areally to the shoreface as before. Instead, reduced volumes of sediment are now added mainly as point sources at the Spey delta and at erosional sites (Hansom, 2001). The result is that periodic alongshore re-distribution of discrete plugs of gravel occurs, and this may give rise to local areas of gravel surplus and deficit.
It follows that interference in the natural transit of gravels will inevitably affect the geomorphological evolution of the Spey system. For example, the hard coastal defences at Porttannachy/Portgordon already interrupt sediment transport and effectively starve the down-drift beach of feeder sediment, thus contributing to accelerated erosion. As a result, proposals to erect coastal defence structures in mid-Spey Bay and protect Kingston are likely to impact negatively on the downdrift beaches of west Spey Bay. Work by Gemmell et al. (2001a) has also shown that increasing fluvial protection of the banks of the River Spey over the last century has probably reduced the amount of sediment entering Spey Bay and may now be beginning to affect the natural geomorphological evolution of the coastal system.
Conclusions
Spey Bay is an important site for coastal geomorphology and of particular interest because the large input of fluvial gravels is unusual in a UK context. The active gravel storm ridges of the present-day coast are some of the finest in Scotland and their constant adjustment to waves in Spey Bay demonstrates both short- and medium-term dynamic coastal processes. The active coastal margin is juxtaposed against a magnificent emerged strandplain, with a suite of gravel shorelines relating to the progressive history of coastal development within the Moray Firth as adjustments took place in Holocene sea levels. Additionally, the site is important on account of the unique fluvial–coastal interaction displayed at Speymouth, where the coarse sediments of the dynamic and actively braided River Spey enter a high-energy, open-coast gravel beach.
At Spey Bay, there is great scope to provide more accurate contemporary and Holocene sediment budgets for the river and coast. In addition, the contemporary development of Spey Bay has three unique features, all of which have great potential for future study: the loss of the sand beach at Lossiemouth and the progressive replacement by the westerly accretion of gravel; the gradual change in coastal orientation of Spey Bay, as updrift erosion in east Spey Bay fuels downdrift accretion; and the dynamics of fluvial-coastal interaction and periodic release of gravels at Speymouth.