Cossey, P.J., Adams, A.E., Purnell, M.A., Whiteley, M.J., Whyte, M.A. & Wright, V.P. 2004 British Lower Carboniferous Stratigraphy. Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 29, JNCC, Peterborough. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Avon Gorge, Bristol, Avon
Introduction
The Avon Gorge site lies 3 km west of Bristol city centre. The GCR site includes exposures on both banks of the river and in the surrounding cliffs and old quarries from near Sneyd Park
Description
Kellaway and Welch (1993) summarize the changes that have affected the Avon Gorge section since the work of Arthur Vaughan. Overall there has been some deterioration in the section, with parts becoming overgrown and inaccessible. The nature of the exposure also changed when a railway line along the right bank was closed and a road (the Portway) opened. The uppermost part of the succession has always been poorly exposed and the Ashton Park Borehole (Kellaway, 1967) was drilled to examine that part of the succession. The construction of new deep tunnels has also added to our knowledge of the stratigraphy of the area. The account here is based on the work of Kellaway and Welch (1993) and a summary stratigraphical column based on their work is illustrated in
In the Bristol area the non-marine beds of the Upper Old Red Sandstone 'pass imperceptibly upwards into the wholly marine sequences of the Carboniferous Limestone' (Kellaway and Welch, 1993). The Shirehampton Beds, which record this passage, are said to possess a mixed Devonian–Carboniferous fauna. For convenience, the base of the Carboniferous Limestone Series is taken at a pebbly sandstone containing fish remains, known as the 'Sneyd Park Fish Bed', at the base of the Shirehampton Beds. The Shirehampton Beds consist of a heterolithic assemblage of impure limestones, mudstones and sandstones. Much of this part of the succession on the right bank of the river is now obscured, but the upper part of the unit, consisting of shale and sandstone overlain by a red crinoidal and bryozoan limestone, known as the 'Bryozoa Bed', can be seen
The Lower Limestone Shale is now poorly exposed in the gorge. On the left bank, about 15 m of thinly bedded mudstones and fine-grained limestones can be seen overlying the Bryozoa Bed
The succeeding limestone-dominated units are better exposed than the muddy facies below. The Black Rock Limestone has been extensively quarried on both sides of the river. It forms the main cliff at Sea Walls on the right bank
The Gully Oolite, called the 'Caninia Oolite' by Vaughan (1905), is the lowest unit in the Clifton Down Group. It consists of massive white-weathering, cross-stratified oolite, the base of which is obscured by dolomitization, such that a fossiliferous unit at the base elsewhere in the Bristol area — the 'Sub-Oolite Bed' — cannot be recognized (Kellaway and Welch, 1993). The Clifton Down Mudstone consists of well-bedded or lenticular, pale-grey carbonate mudstones and stromatolites with very few fossils. The upper part contains three beds of more massive, cross-stratified, oolitic and crinoidal limestone, correlated with the Goblin Combe Oolite found to the south of Bristol
The Clifton Down Limestone is seen particularly well in sections at Great Quarry
The higher part of the Clifton Down Limestone is described by Reynolds (1921). He recognized two developments of 'oolitic' limestone, the Seminula Pisolite and the Seminula Oolite, separated by a vuggy dolomite 1.5 m thick. Chert bands and silicified fossils are prominent in the Seminula Pisolite. The Seminula Oolite has a notably sharp base. The oolite grades up into bioclastic limestones and then into fine-grained limestones lacking abundant faunas and resembling those near the base of the group. The uppermost part of the succession, known as the 'Concretionary Beds', comprises stromatolitic limestones interbedded with shales and brecciated limestones. On the left bank of the river, quarries 4
Strata immediately to the north of the suspension bridge are affected by the Avon Thrust
Interpretation
The Vaughan zonal scheme for the shelf limestones of the Lower Carboniferous succession, as outlined in his work on the succession of faunas in the Avon Gorge (Vaughan, 1905), became, with some modifications (e.g. Reynolds, 1921), the reference section to which other sections in the British Isles were compared. However, although he set out to produce a workable zonal scheme, Vaughan noted that 'Such a system, deduced from the examination of a single area and founded entirely upon two fossil groups, cannot of course presume to be more than a preliminary attempt to deal with a large and complicated problem; but it may serve as part of the scaffolding, by means of which a system of general application will ultimately be built up' (Vaughan, 1905). Riley (1993), in his review of Dinantian biostratigraphy, pays tribute to the careful observations and descriptions of Vaughan and his awareness of fundamental biostratigraphical concepts that allowed the scheme to have much greater scope than was originally envisaged. Vaughan's zones were not replaced until George et al. (1976) set up their regional stages, but even their scheme inherited some boundaries that were originally used by Vaughan.
The need for a replacement of Vaughan's zones became apparent when it was realized that the Avon Gorge succession is not a record of continuous Dinantian sedimentation, but contains a number of non-sequences (see
The third non-sequence lies at the top of the Gully Oolite where the Clifton Down Mudstone rests on an irregular erosive surface cut in the oolite. George et al. (1976) record that much of the lower part of the Arundian Stage is missing, although with the impoverished faunas of the Clifton Down Mudstone the extent of this non-sequence is difficult to establish. Ramsbottom (1973) recorded three faunal horizons of northern England that were absent from the Avon Gorge section at this level. The base of the Holkerian Stage in the Avon Gorge succession is taken at the base of the Seminula Oolite, which has also been interpreted as an erosion surface indicating a stratigraphical break (Kellaway and Welch, 1993) and forms the fourth non-sequence. The fifth non-sequence occurs at the base of the Hotwells Limestone. Although the early Asbian brachiopod Daviesiella Ilangollensis is absent from this unit, the late Asbian form Davidsonina septosa is known from the base of the Hotwells Limestone in the Mendips (Kellaway and Welch, 1993).
Apart from 200 thin-sections examined by Reynolds (1921) during his work on the lithological succession, there is an absence of detailed petrographical work and facies analysis of the section in the Avon Gorge. However, Kellaway and Welch (1993) provide a summary of the palaeoenvironments represented. The whole succession was deposited on the Mendip Shelf which, at least for the earlier part of Dinantian times, was probably a southerly dipping ramp (
The largely terrigenous Shirehampton Beds were deposited in restricted marine or brackish water environments (Kellaway and Welch, 1993). Their accumulation was followed by a period of non-deposition or erosion represented by a non-sequence. The Lower Limestone Shale marked a change to more open marine conditions, but still with a significant supply of fine-grained detrital material. This supply of detritus was reduced during deposition of the overlying Black Rock Group, which contains a diverse fauna in a fine matrix, and probably represents open marine below wave-base environments. The Gully Oolite was deposited in shallower high-energy conditions with shifting, perhaps tidal, sand-bodies providing a habitat inimical to most organisms (Kellaway and Welch, 1993). In contrast, the Clifton Down Mudstone represents low-energy, restricted, sometimes stagnant, lagoonal environments with an Impoverished fauna. This gives way to more open marine conditions again, characterized by bioclastic limestone in the lower part of the Clifton Down Limestone. Shallow, agitated water oolitic deposits (the Seminula Oolite and Pisolite) are succeeded by a return to lagoonal deposits at the top of the Clifton Down Limestone. Following a break in sedimentation, the Hotwells Limestone was deposited in open-shelf conditions of fairly high energy, supporting a diverse and abundant fauna (Kellaway and Welch, 1993).
Conclusions
Despite the deterioration In some parts of the succession since the early part of the 20th century, when the classic work of Vaughan and Reynolds was undertaken, the Avon Gorge still provides the best section through much of the Dinantian sequence of the Bristol area. Its importance lies partly in its historical association with one of the most important developments in Carboniferous stratigraphy, but also it continues to provide a valuable resource for research into the stratigraphy and sedimentology of Lower Carboniferous shelf limestones in southern England.