Cossey, P.J., Adams, A.E., Purnell, M.A., Whiteley, M.J., Whyte, M.A. & Wright, V.P. 2004 British Lower Carboniferous Stratigraphy. Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 29, JNCC, Peterborough. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Baileycroft Quarry, Derbyshire
Introduction
The Baileycroft Quarry GCR site
Description
At this site, approximately 11 m of Bee Low Limestones are exposed, comprising thickly bedded grainstones and packstones with a few discontinuous layers and lenses of disarticulated brachiopods. A typical Asbian fauna is present, including Axophyllum 'Carcinophyllum' vaughani, Dibunophyllum bourtonenese, Palaeosimilia murchisoni and Davidsonina septosa (Frost and Smart, 1979). The prominent bedding planes are overlain by clay wayboards and represent palaeokarstic surfaces. The top of the Asbian Stage is marked by an irregular karstic surface with a prominent shale. Overlying this are a few metres of the Brigantian succession (Monsal Dale Limestones) comprising dark wackestone passing upwards into massive, well-sorted, crinoidal packstone–grainstone. Above this is an unconformity that progressively cuts down through the Monsal Dale Limestones into the Bee Low Limestones as the unconformity surface is traced from the top of the quarry face at its northern end to the base of the face at its southern end
Some 10 m of section is exposed in the salt stockpile area, and at the south end of this face a prominent, highly undulatory discontinuity is present, overlain by thinly bedded dark limestones that drape the disconformity surface
Interpretation
The Bee Low Limestones were deposited on a flat-topped carbonate shelf in a few tens of metres water depth. Occasional sea-level low-stands resulted in the accumulation of volcanic-derived soils on palaeokarstic surfaces over the emergent carbonate platform during this period. The shelf carbonates were deposited within a few hundred metres of the Asbian shelf margin, located beneath Wirksworth at this time. This was followed by an episode of exposure and karstification at the Asbian–Brigantian boundary with carbonate sedimentation resuming in a shelf-top environment. The unconformity seen in Baileycroft Quarry formed during Brigantian times and locally removed all of the underlying Brigantian succession (Shirley, 1959; Walkden, 1970; Frost and Smart, 1979). This unconformity is thought to be below the level of the section exposed in the salt stockpile area. The pale limestones in this exposure are interpreted as bioclastic carbonates deposited by submarine debris flows and slumps derived from the Brigantian shelf. At least one major slumped unit is present in the pale bioclastic limestones that make up the lower part of the succession. The discontinuity seen at the south end of the salt stockpile is re-interpreted as a slump plane that emplaced thinly bedded argillaceous limestones on top of the thinly bedded, pale, coarsely bioclastic limestones. The contorted bedding was probably accentuated by compaction. The presence of gigantoproductids in the pale limestones at the base of the exposure suggests that they are of Brigantian age (Pattison, 1981).
Conclusions
The unconformity seen at Baileycroft Quarry may represent part of a deep channel-like incision that formed perpendicular to the platform margin during Asbian times. This channel probably originated during a lowstand in Brigantian times when the shelf margin was deeply karsted removing much of the Brigantian shelf and slope deposits. This feature subsequently formed a submarine channel down which shelf-derived bioclastic sediment was transported by debris flows and slumps. Further work is needed to determine the date of the lower bioclastic interval at the salt stockpile and the age of the overlying dark thinly bedded limestones.