Cossey, P.J., Adams, A.E., Purnell, M.A., Whiteley, M.J., Whyte, M.A. & Wright, V.P. 2004 British Lower Carboniferous Stratigraphy. Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 29, JNCC, Peterborough.
The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
The Cawdor Quarry GCR site is a disused quarry
Most of the main face
The Monsal Dale Limestones–Eyam Limestones boundary is marked by a grey clay (30 cm thick), which overlies a surface developed on the underlying Monsal Dale Limestones topped by some palaeokarstic pits up to 0.5 m deep.
Above this, the Eyam Limestones comprise approximately 23 m of dark fossiliferous limestones and shales. The formation can be divided into three units. The lower unit (c. 6.5 m) consists of thinly bedded dark cherty biomicrites with minor shale partings and a relatively sparse fauna. It is capped by an angular discordance that represents an intra-Brigantian unconformity. This in turn is overlain by a middle unit (c. 7.5 m) composed mainly of shales with minor developments of limestone in its middle and top sections. This unit has proved to be particularly fossiliferous, yielding ostracodes in abundance (Robinson, 1959) and rich zaphrentid coral assemblages (Hudson, 1943; Smith et al., 1967), together with trilobites (Paladin), brachiopods (including Lingula, Orbiculoidea and Productus concinnus), gastropods and scattered bivalves. The upper unit (c. 9 m) comprises dark fossiliferous shales with a prominent muddy limestone bed (1 m) near its top. Trilobite–brachiopod assemblages recorded from this unit resemble those of the underlying middle unit; however, the upper unit does contain some distinctive P2 bivalve–goniatite taxa including Posidonia membranacea, Sudeticeras stolbergi (P2b) and Lyrogoniatites aff. georgiensis (P2c) (Smith et al., 1967; Riley, 1993).
Regrettably, although Shirley (1959) recorded the P2a subzonal indicator Lusitanoceras 'Goniatites' granosus from this sequence, there remains uncertainty as to whether this record was from beds below or above the unconformity. However, it is assumed to have originated from either the lower or middle unit of the Eyam Limestones as described in this account (see Smith et al., 1967).
The Monsal Dale Limestones were deposited on a shallow carbonate shelf prone to occasional periods of emergence. The palaeokarst that defines the Monsal Dale Limestones-Eyam Limestones boundary most probably developed during a period of exposure when the whole of the Derbyshire Platform became emergent (Gutteridge, 1989a). This was followed by the establishment of a sheltered, low-energy depositional setting in which the Eyam Limestones accumulated. The intra-Brigantian unconformity is one of several local unconformities present along the eastern margin of the Derbyshire Platform that may have formed during an episode of intra-Brigantian inversion (Gutteridge, 1989a). The progressive upward change to a shale-dominated succession reflects the progressive shut-down of carbonate production on the platform. Fossils indicate a Brigand= and late Brigantian age for the Monsal Dale Limestones and Eyam Limestones respectively.
Cawdor Quarry demonstrates the sedimentological and faunal evolution of the south-eastern part of the Derbyshire Platform during Brigantian times. The Monsal Dale Limestones were formed on a shallow carbonate shelf subject to periods of subaerial exposure, while the Eyam Limestones, represented by the 'dark facies' (traditionally regarded as 'quasi-basinal' deposits and formed at an uncertain water depth) most probably developed on the margins of an intra-platform basin or sheltered shelf setting (Walkden, 1970; Gutteridge, 1987, 1989a).