Cossey, P.J., Adams, A.E., Purnell, M.A., Whiteley, M.J., Whyte, M.A. & Wright, V.P. 2004 British Lower Carboniferous Stratigraphy. Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 29, JNCC, Peterborough. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Elliscales Quarry, Cumbria
Introduction
The Elliscales Quarry GCR site is a disused quarry
Description
Adams (1984) described the bedded facies adjacent to the Elliscales reefs as finely bioclastic peloidal packstones with some grainstones, and the reefs as pale-weathering masses of unbedded, mottled and fossiliferous fine-grained limestones with vertical walls and dome-shaped tops. Two prominent reefs are exposed on the north and west faces of the quarry
Frame-building organisms in the reef facies include Syringopora (tabulate coral), solenoporoid algae, the problematic Aphralysia and a few microbial thrombolites and stromatolites. Typically these organisms are found in their life position and as delicate upward-branching attached or encrusting growth forms. The more erect of these growth forms most probably acted as baffles to gentle currents carrying suspended sediment in a fairly low-energy environment (Adams, 1984). Within the reefs a strong ecological zonation is evident, with Syringopora at the base, passing up into a Syringopora–Aphralysia–thrombolite association in the middle, and a solenoporoid alga–Aphralysia–thrombolite association at the top
Other fixed forms recognized as contributing to the development of the reef framework and assisting in the binding and trapping of fine-grained sediment include fenestelloid, fistuliporoid and branching bryozoans (the most common group), tuberitinid foraminifera, spirorbid worms, rhodophyte algae (ungdarellids), cyanobacteria (Girvanella) and other micro-problematica (Garwoodia). Additional forms identified by Adams (1984) as less-significant elements of the reef core include the brachiopods (Cleiothyridina cf. glabristria, Stenoscisma isorhyncha, Schizophoria and Derbyia), corals (Michelinia megastoma, Caninia ciliata, Clisiophyllum ingletonense, Palaeosmilia murchisoni and Koninckophyllum praecursor) (Garwood, 1913; Rose and Dunham, 1977), 'coiled nautiloids or goniatites' (Nicholas, 1968), echinoids, crinoids, ostracodes, endothyrid and tetrataxid foraminifera, calcispheres, the ?cyanobacterium Renalcis (Adams, 1983) and ?Uraloporella (Adams, 1984), an organism of uncertain biological affinity.
Interpretation
Adams (1984) was the first to determine that the Elliscales reefs were ecologically zoned biogenic structures built by sessile organisms that encrusted one another to produce a rigid and wave-resistant organic framework. The presence of abraded grain calcarenites and lithified blocks of the reef framework in talus bands on the reef flanks confirmed that the developments were at least partially cemented and resistant to occasional periods of turbulence (Adams, 1984). The gentle arching of limestone beds over the tops of the reefs Indicates that reef elevation above the sea floor during growth must have been minimal (Nicholas, 1968; Adams, 1984). The greater quantity of 'carbonate mud' noted adjacent to the reefs than in other areas is attributed to the sheltering effect provided by the presence of the reefs, despite their low elevation (Nicholas, 1968).
Although similar but much smaller reefs occur in the Martin Limestone at Marton Quarry, 3 km north-east of Elliscales, their distribution over the Lake District Block may not be confined to the Furness district as previously envisaged (Adams, 1984) since blocks of strikingly similar reef material also occur at Meathop to the east. However, attempts to account for their development in a regional palaeogeographical context have been hampered by poor exposure of Arundian successions in the area. Originally, Nicholas (1968) suggested that the reefs developed on the back of an embryonic fold structure, the 'High Haume Anticline', but regional thickness trends for formations within the Arundian succession conflict with this view (Rose and Dunham, 1977; Adams, 1984). Further speculation by Nicholas (1968) that the reefs developed in a shelf-margin setting was rejected by Adams (1984) who, in consideration of Lower Carboniferous isopach data for northern England presented by George (1958), suggested that any shelf edge, if present, would have had a north-east--south-west trend and been located some kilometres to the south-east of the present site. Following this view, Adams (1984) considered the buildups as 'patch reefs' that developed on a shelf area, and that their north-south elongation was the product of gentle (possibly tidal) current movements oblique to the shelf margin. Reef growth was rapid in response to high sedimentation rates as the shelf subsided.
Conclusions
The reefs at Elliscales Quarry contain an ecologically diverse fauna and flora that is unique within the Arundian successions of south Cumbria. The exceptional preservation of frame-building organisms (chiefly lime-secreting algae, coral and other micro-organisms) make this one of the most Important sites in Britain for understanding the organic evolution of Lower Carboniferous reef systems. At no other site in north-west England can the organic framework to an ancient reef of this particular type be so clearly demonstrated.