Cossey, P.J., Adams, A.E., Purnell, M.A., Whiteley, M.J., Whyte, M.A. & Wright, V.P. 2004 British Lower Carboniferous Stratigraphy. Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 29, JNCC, Peterborough. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Malham, North Yorkshire
Introduction
The Malham GCR site (formerly referred to as the 'Malham, Gordale and Cawden Wedber Burns' GCR site) covers several square kilometres to the north of Malham village
Description
Most of the exposures within this site are of the Malham Formation (
The Gordale Limestone Member is the major scar-forming limestone in the Settle area and is typically between 70 m and 75 m thick. In its type section at Gordale Scar
Arthurton et al. (1988) note that the Gordale Limestone Member consists of bioclastic wackestones, packstones and grainstones in which the dominant bioclasts are foraminifera, calcispheres, palaeoberesellids, crinoid fragments and ostracodes. One feature of the Gordale Limestone Member in the transition zone is the presence of coarse lithoclastic grainstone units. For example, a conglomerate a few metres above the base of the member is seen near Strideout Edge
Much of the northern part of this site consists of Gordale Limestone Member, which forms the classic limestone pavements of the hill tops and the scars of the valley sides. However, locally, the overlying Wensleydale Group is exposed, although only the Lower Hawes Limestone at the base of the group occurs in this area. It consists of bioclastic packstones darker in colour than the Gordale Limestone Member and contains thin oncoid-bearing horizons (Arthurton et al., 1988). It can be seen in a small quarry next to the road at
In the southern part of the site, south of the Middle Craven Fault, the shelf-margin reef-belt occurs
Interpretation
The lithostratigraphical scheme applied at this site was adopted by Mundy and Arthurton (1980) and Arthurton et al. (1988) as a result of the resurvey of the area (1:50 000 map of the Settle district, British Geological Survey, 1989) and the acquisition of new borehole information. The term 'Great Scar Limestone', originating from the work of Phillips (1836), and applied to Askrigg Block limestones resting on Lower Palaeozoic rocks and overlain by Yoredale facies, was dropped by Arthurton et al. (1988), as were the subdivisions proposed by Ramsbottom (1974) and followed by George et al. (1976). This revision was adopted partly because marker bands used to divide the succession farther north are not recognizable in the Settle district. Recently, however, Mundy (2000) re-introduced the term as a 'group' name for the Kilnsey and Malham formations.
The Cove Limestone Member at this site contains a more restricted Holkerian foraminiferal assemblage than that found farther north on the Askrigg Block and this has been interpreted as a sign of deeper-water conditions at the northern edge of the block (Arthurton et al., 1988). The Gordale Limestone Member contains a typical Asbian fauna. The marginal reef limestones also contain an Asbian fauna and are the same age as the Gordale Limestone Member. The Lower Hawes Limestone is of Brigantian age in the Settle area (Arthurton et al., 1988).
The exposed shelf limestone succession at the Malham site records deposition more-or-less continuously from late Holkerian to early Brigantian times. The succession is thicker than that in the immediate area to the north, away from the block margin, and palaeokarstic surfaces are less well developed (Arthurton et al., 1988), suggesting that subsidence rates were more rapid to the north where periods of emergence were less significant. Cyclicity in the 'Great Scar Limestone' has attracted the attention of a number of workers. Schwarzacher (1958) recognized a number of cycles divided by master bedding planes spaced at intervals of approximately 10 m, each cycle being a major scar-forming unit traceable over long distances. Lithological variation appeared to be related to this cyclicity, with fossil concentrations and current features such as cross-stratification more common adjacent to the master bedding planes. Doughty (1968), in a study of jointing in the Gordale Limestone Member, noted that each cycle showed a trend from closely to widely spaced joints from base to top, and that this was also related to a lithological variation. In the Gordale area sedimentary cyclicity is undoubtedly present, but is not as simple as that suggested by Schwarzacher (1958) and Doughty (1968), which is more easily applicable to successions farther north (Arthurton et al., 1988). At the shelf edge the thicker succession lacks the well-developed clay-shale intervals that characterize the master bedding planes of the block interior.
The marginal reef in the southern part of the site represents the remains of a once-continuous shelf-margin feature, contemporaneous with the Malham Formation of the shelf which has been faulted and eroded to its present form (Arthurton et al., 1988)
Conclusions
This classic locality offers the best exposures of the Malham Formation close to the margin of the Askrigg Block. The type sections for both members of the formation, the Cove Limestone Member and the Gordale Limestone Member, are within the site. The cyclicity of the limestones is of great interest here and requires further work to understand its relationship to the simple cyclicity described from the interior of the block. The site also contains excellent exposures of part of the marginal reef complex, including an exposure of the buildup framework from which many rare fossils have been recovered.