Cossey, P.J., Adams, A.E., Purnell, M.A., Whiteley, M.J., Whyte, M.A. & Wright, V.P. 2004 British Lower Carboniferous Stratigraphy. Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 29, JNCC, Peterborough. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Petershill, West Lothian
Introduction
High in the hills 1 km to the north-east of Bathgate a staggered line of old quarries highlight the outcrop of a thick sedimentary intercalation within the Bathgate Hills Volcanic Formation (Bathgate Group). The largely volcanic sequence of the Bathgate Hills Volcanic Formation makes up the elevated topography of the Bathgate Hills and dips westwards beneath younger rocks of the Central Coalfield Basin on whose eastern margin it lies. The Petershill GCR site embraces two of these quarries, the Petershill Reservoir Quarry
Description
A schematic cross-section showing the facies relations in the Petershill Limestone at this site is illustrated in
Exposed at the southern end of the quarry are more massive limestones (9 m), the principal facies of a 'biohermal buildup' first recognized by Jameson (1987). These overlie the bedded limestones and are separated from them by an erosion surface (see
The Rifle Range Quarries run for about a kilometre along the strike of the beds, and in these the lower parts of the Petershill Limestone consist of heterogeneous packstones
Interpretation
The Petershill Limestone is part of a major sedimentary intercalation within the volcanic sequence of the Bathgate Hills Volcanic Formation. The location of this volcanic activity may be linked to the major structural feature of the Burntisland High (Jameson, 1987; and see
The Petershill Limestone formed during a relatively quiescent phase in the volcanic activity. The lavas, which underlie this marine limestone, are overlain by a sequence of tuffs and sandstones with plant rcmains. Thcsc indicatc a prolonged period of subaerial weathering prior to the marine transgression. Marine deposition commenced with the formation of a thin dark shale that passed up into the calcareous mudstones and argillaceous limestones of the basal parts of the Petershill Limestone. These appear to have formed in a shallow lagoonal environment (Jameson, 1987). As the transgression continued, purer limestones were deposited in the southern part of the outcrop (Jameson, 1987). Representatives of both the argillaceous limestones and the purer limestones are seen on the eastern bank of the Petershill Reservoir Quarry.
Following a subsequent regressive episode, during which the erosion surface at Rifle Range Quarries was formed, a more varied suite of carbonates were deposited. In particular, the heterogeneous packstones of the Rifle Range Quarries were deposited in a shallow-water nearshore area, which was subject to relatively high-energy conditions. The turbulence caused movement of crinoid debris, overturning of corals and the disarticulation and stacking of gigantoproductid valves. These carbonate shoals protected a landward lagoon in which argillaceous limestones and calcareous mudstones, similar to those at the base of the Petershill Limestone, continued to form (Jameson, 1987). At the same time, but on the seaward side of the shoals and in slightly deeper water, the growth of sponges, bryozoans and algae contributed to the development of the massive limestones that formed the core of the biohermal buildup at Petershill Reservoir Quarry (Jameson, 1987). Jameson (1987) has found evidence from geopetal structures to indicate that the buildup had a relief of 1.5–2 m above the local sea floor and that the flanks sloped at about 10° to 12°. The sequence of assemblages within the bioherm indicates an initial pioneer community colonizing an area of algally stabilized sediment and building up a low mound. The increased abundance and diversity of the fauna led to rapid in-situ accumulation and stabilization of the mound. Continued upward growth, however, exposed the mound to increased current activity and led to the formation of the crinoidal beds, which cover the mound. These show that the mound was not able to withstand significant current activity.
The erosion surfaces at the top of the Petershill Limestone indicate regressive phases of erosion and subaerial exposure separated by a minor transgression during which crinoidal grainstones formed (Jameson, 1987). The fissures preserve in their infill sedimentary material, which is not preserved elsewhere, and which indicates the prolonged nature of these two events. The presence of tuffaceous material in the fissures indicates some volcanic activity. Intermittent volcanic activity also took place during the deposition of the limestone since the impersistent clay wayboards are bentonite horizons resulting from the alteration of ash-fall deposits (Stephenson and Monro in McAdam and Clarkson, 1986; Jameson, 1987).
The faunas of the Petershill Limestone are not only of great palaeoecological importance but are also of immense taxonomic significance. This is the source horizon for the type material of a number of important and well-known corals including Actinocyathus floriformis, Aulophyllum pachyendothecum, Koninckophyllum ecbinatum and Caninia juddi (Hill, 1938–1941), and Parks (1954) based his study of morphological variation in Aulophyllum pachyendothecum on material from Petershill Reservoir Quarry. Hinde (1887–1912) used material from Petershill in his description of the sponge Hyalostelia, and Davidson (1851–1886, 1860) also used material from this area in brachiopod descriptions. Clark (1960) described conodonts from the Petershill Limestone, and Latham (1932) lists ostracode species from quarries in the limestone. Fleming's (1825) description of Dentalium indistincta (= Sphenothallus indistincta) is most probably based on Petershill material (the first scientific description of a sphenothallid tube) and, in addition, spirorbid worm tubes have been recorded from the Petershill Limestone by Etheridge (1880). The foraminiferal assemblage indicates a late Viséan age for this unit (Jameson, 1980).
Conclusions
The Petershill GCR site is a classic and important site famous for its Lower Carboniferous fossils and its carbonates. The Petershill Limestone (upper Brigantian) lies within the predominantly volcanic sequence of the Bathgate Hills Volcanic Formation and shows clearly the effect of volcanism on local sedimentation. The lateral and vertical facies variations within the Petershill Limestone are of immense interest to carbonate sedimentologists and palaeontologists. The limestone comprises a unique biohermal buildup with a diverse, abundant and well-preserved fauna, and a laterally equivalent facies of coarsely bedded limestones with corals and gigantoproductids that were deposited on an adjacent shoal area. The faunas of the Petershill Limestone remain of great palaeoecological, stratigraphical and taxonomic significance.