Cossey, P.J., Adams, A.E., Purnell, M.A., Whiteley, M.J., Whyte, M.A. & Wright, V.P. 2004 British Lower Carboniferous Stratigraphy. Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 29, JNCC, Peterborough. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
School Share, North Yorkshire
Introduction
The School Share GCR site is a stream section located in the bank of Black Gill Beck
Description
At the base of the section, below the School Share Boulder Bed, Dixon and Hudson (1931) described two shale units separated by a sharp erosive contact (non-sequence) at beck-level. This included a lower unit (Lower Bowland Shales) comprising 2.4 m of dark, closely jointed shales with bunions containing the P2 (Brigantian) goniatites Lyrogoniatites and Sagittoceras cf. meslerianum;and a higher unit (Upper Bowland Shales) consisting of 5.5 m of dark shales with small limestone clasts and bunions, but seemingly without joints or readily identifiable stratigraphically useful goniatites (Arthurton et al., 1988). Currently the lower part of this succession (including the non-sequence) is obscured by weathered debris from the stream bank
Overlying these units, the School Share Boulder Bed (c. 5 m) is a limestone debris bed containing angular blocks of medium- to dark-coloured oncoidal wackestone and crinoidal packstone loosely set in a pyritic mudstone matrix
The Upper Bowland Shales above the debris bed comprise a further 5 m of the dark calcareous mudstone containing bullions and a Pendleian (Elb) fauna that includes Posidonia corrugata and the diagnostic goniatite Tumulites pseudobilinguis (formerly Eumorphoceras pseudobilingue;see Arthurton et al., 1988; Brandon et al., 1998). Regrettably, the geometry and lateral continuity of beds recognized at this site cannot be established as parts of the section are badly weathered and disrupted by faulting (Garwood and Goodyear, 1924; British Geological Survey, 1989).
Interpretation
Sedimentological and palaeontological evidence indicates that at this site the Bowland Shales were deposited during late Dinantian and early Namurian times as a deep-water marine facies close to the contemporary southern margin of the Askrigg Block and within the transition zone of the Craven Fault System. However, a significant stratigraphical gap between the Lower Bowland Shales (P2) at the base of the section and the Upper Bowland Shales (E1b) at the top of the section is indicated by: the erosion surface (non-sequence) recognized by Dixon and Hudson (1931); the development of the School Share Boulder Bed and its associated erosion surface; and the apparent absence of early Pendleian (E1a) strata. Although this stratigraphical gap represents a relatively 'small hiatus' within the School Share succession (Dixon and Hudson, 1931), it is generally regarded as the local equivalent of the more extensive sub-Pendleian and basal Namurian unconformity that is recognized throughout the Craven District at the base of the Upper Bowland Shales (Hudson, 1930a; and see Settle GCR site report, this chapter).
The development of this unconformity and of the School Share Boulder Bed has been widely attributed to a period of 'mid-Carboniferous' or late Brigantian–early Pendleian earth movements which, in the Craven District, were centred mainly along the line of the Middle Craven Fault. This fault, arguably the most significant of the basin-margin faults active within the Craven Fault System at the end of the Viséan Epoch, profoundly influenced the character of Lower Carboniferous successions in the area — most notably in separating the shallow-water facies of the Askrigg Block to the north, from deeper-water facies in the Craven Basin to the south (Ramsbottom, 1974; Arthurton et al., 1988; Kirby et al., 2000; Mundy, 2000).
The formation of the School Share Boulder Bed was considered in detail by Dixon and Hudson (1931) who suggested a local origin for the boulders on account of their angularity, size, composition and unweathered appearance. These same authors concluded that the deposit was most probably the product of a subaqueous land-slip' emanating from an active submarine fault-scarp raised by earth movements at the end of Viséan times. Evidence of late Brigantian faulting and the occurrence of in-situ Wensleydale Group lithofacies similar to that seen in the boulders south of the Middle Craven Fault (Arthurton et al., 1988; British Geological Survey, 1989) support the idea of an active submarine fault-scarp in the vicinity of School Share at this time. An alternative view put forward by Walker (1967) was that the slopes necessary for the generation of submarine debris slides in the vicinity of School Share were primarily the result of an extended late Viséan period of differential subsidence and sedimentation across the basin margin, during which carbonate shoals built up at the southern edge of the Askrigg Block which temporarily starved the Craven Basin of sediment. The present authors' view is that both contemporaneous faulting and differential subsidence/sedimentation were influential in the formation of the School Share Boulder Bed. More recently N. Riley (pers. comm., 2002) has interpreted the boulder bed and overlying disturbed shales as a submarine canyon fill.
Conclusions
The development of the School Share Boulder Bed and associated unconformity provides important evidence of a late Brigantian-early Pendleian episode of tectonic instabilty within the Craven Fault System. The occurrence of these features remains critical to our understanding of the tectono-sedimentary evolution of the transition zone between the Askrigg Block and the Craven Basin; one of the most complex areas of Lower Carboniferous geology in Britain.