Cossey, P.J., Adams, A.E., Purnell, M.A., Whiteley, M.J., Whyte, M.A. & Wright, V.P. 2004 British Lower Carboniferous Stratigraphy. Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 29, JNCC, Peterborough. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Whitberry Burn, Cumbria
Introduction
Located approximately 4 km west of Bewcastle, the Whitberry Burn GCR site
Description
The Whitberry Burn succession (see
Interpretation
The section in Whitberry Burn has played a significant role in establishing correlations within the Northumberland Trough, especially in attempts to establish the relationship between the sequences in the Bewcastle area and the Fell Sandstone Group to the east. Garwood (1931), for example, suggested that 'the sandstone which crops out above the Chonetes cumbriensis Band in Whitberry Burn [i.e. above the Whitberry Member] may represent the Fell Sandstone', and correlated the Hillend Algal Member with algal horizons In the Kershopefoot, Coomsden Burn (Redesdale), Kielder and Rothbury areas. Lumsden et al. (1967) correlated the Syringo-thyris Limestone Member with the Harden Member in the Newcastleton area. Ramsbottom (1973) took the Hillend Algal Member as the top of his Major Cyde 2 regression. Following this, George et al. (1976) correlated the Cambeck Formation with the Southerness Limestone Formation to the west (see Kirkbean GCR site report, this chapter) and the Harden Member to the north, and stated that the 'Hillend Algal Band … is taken as the highest bed of the [Chadian] stage.' However, more recent biostratigraphical data in the form of conodonts (Armstrong and Purnell, 1987; Purnell, 1989, 1992) and miospores (Mandi and Butterworth, 1994) from Whitberry Burn indicate that the Cambeck Formation is mostly of Holkerian age. Purnell (1989) suggested that the base of the Middle Border Group in the Bewcastle area correlated approximately with the base of the Fell Sandstone Group in the North Tyne area (Fowler, 1966) but that the base of the Fell Sandstone Group in the Rothbury area may be somewhat older. Turner et al. (1997), however, interpreted the coarsening-upward Barron's Pike Sandstone Member as a westerly progradation of the Fell Sandstone Group delta system.
Analysis of the limestone facies in Whitberry Burn indicates shallow subtidal marine deposition, ranging from lagoon-like environments subject to relatively frequent agitation, to quieter settings below fair-weather wave-base but subject to periodic storm agitation (Leeder, 1975b; Purnell, 1989). There are no detailed interpretations of the clastic facies published, but they have generally been interpreted as deltaic in origin. Palaeocurrent data indicate that they were sourced from the east by axial flow along the Northumberland Trough, with the alternation of facies reflecting delta shifting and abandonment as a result of tectonic or auto-cyclic mechanisms rather than sea-level changes (Turner et al, 1993, 1997; contra Ramsbottom, 1973).
Conclusions
The Whitberry Burn GCR site contains the best exposures through the Cambeck Formation of the Lower Border Group and thus provides important data for lithostratigraphical and biostratigraphical correlation, and for the interpretation of the palaeogeography, depositional environments and evolution of the Northumberland Trough during the Holkerian Age. As the type section of the Whitberry Member, the base of the Middle Border Group is defined in the Whitberry Burn sequence. Furthermore, several other marker horizons crop out that have been of critical importance in the development of lithostratigraphical schemes and sedimentological models within the Northumberland Trough.