Simms, M.J., Chidlaw, N., Morton, N. & Page, K.N. 2004. British Lower Jurassic Stratigraphy. Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 30, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, ISBN 1 86 107 495 6. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Pinhay Bay to Fault Corner, and East Cliff, Dorset
Introduction
The importance of the Lower Jurassic succession exposed at the Pinhay Bay to Fault Corner GCR site, which incorporates the Seatown to Watton Cliff GCR site, and farther east at the East Cliff GCR site, cannot be overstated. This locality provides the most continuous section of this stratigraphical interval exposed anywhere in Britain, exposing a diverse range of facies, and is among the most intensively studied Jurassic areas in Britain. The succession at Pinhay Bay to Fault Corner is more frequently cited as a comparative succession for Lower Jurassic sequences elsewhere than any other site in Britain and, probably, the world. The diverse fossil fauna from this locality is uniquely well-documented and includes a greater number of type specimens than any other Lower Jurassic site in Britain. The sites form part of the Dorset and east Devon Coast, England's only natural World Heritage Site. They are of immense importance for understanding early Jurassic stratigraphy, palaeontology and sedimentology.
The earliest reference to the Lias of Dorset was by Woodward (1728) who commented on 'incredible numbers of these shells thus flattened and extremely tender in shivery stone about Pyrton Passage, Lime and Watchet'. Maton (1797) gave a general description of the Dorset Lias, referring to the presence of septarian nodules and also to the abundance of pyrite and organic matter in the shales. Other early accounts included those of De Luc (1805) and Townsend (1813); more detailed descriptions were published by De la Beche (1822, 1826) and Conybeare and Phillips (1822). De la Beche (1826) noted the main lithological and palaeontological features and was the first to illustrate the cliffs and their contained successions in the schematic form that has become characteristic of publications dealing with this stretch of coast. Many subsequent publications have referred to the Dorset Lias in some context. Notable among these are the works of Day (1863), Wright (1878–1886), Woodward (1893), Woodward et al. (1911), Wilson et al. (1958) and the seminal series of papers by Lang (1914 to 1936). The application of new technology has seen the publication of useful alternative stratigraphies based on, for instance, spectral gamma-ray analysis (Parkinson, 1996; Bessa and Hesselbo, 1997) which has proven a useful aid to correlation with successions elsewhere as well as a tool for palaeoecological interpretations.
There have been many useful summary accounts of the succession, notable among which are those by Wilson et al. (1958), Macfadyen (1970), House (1989), Callomon and Cope (1995), and Hesselbo and Jenkyns (1995), although Arkell's (1933) description seems somewhat confused in parts.
The succession in this locality is of immense palaeontological significance on account of its extensive exposures, the often fossiliferous nature of the succession, and the exceptional preservation at some horizons. Material from here has formed the basis of many monographic studies and continues to do so. It is the type locality for at least 14 species of fossil reptile (Benton and Spencer, 1995), many species of fish (Dineley and Metcalf 1999), and an even greater diversity of invertebrates of all types. It also played an important part in the early development of the science of palaeontology and the theory of evolution, particularly through the collecting of Mary Anning.
Description
The western boundary of this locality lies just west of a fault that downthrows the lower part of the Blue Lias Formation to the west against the Triassic Langport Member (formerly White Lias) of the Lilstock Formation
The Blue Lias Formation comprises frequent alternations, mostly on a scale of a few decimetres or less, of tabular or nodular micritic limestones interbedded with darker, organic-rich, laminated shales, and light and dark marls
On a larger scale, division into limestone-dominated and shale-dominated intervals is less strongly developed than at some other sites, such as the Blue Anchor–Lilstock Coast or the Lavernock to St Mary's Well Bay GCR sites, although mudstone-dominated intervals are evident in the Liasicus and mid-Bucklandi zones. This can be seen clearly in Church Cliffs, where the lower 5 m is characterized by crowded limestones with Top Tape (Bed 29) at the top, and is overlain by some 9 m of more widely spaced limestones.
The Blue Lias Formation contains a rich and diverse fauna. Benthic taxa are well represented, particularly in some of the limestones and the paler mudstones but not in the organic-rich paper shales. Benthos includes various species of bivalve, including Plagiostoma and Gryphaea arcuata, the crinoid Isocrinus psilonoti, echinoids including Miocidaris lobatum and Diademopsis, the brachiopods Calcirhynchia calcaria and Spiriferina and, at some horizons, gastropods, bryozoa and, rarely, isastraeid corals. The microfauna includes foraminifera and ostracods (Lord and Boomer, 1990), ophiuroid and holothurian debris (Gilliland, 1992), and both marine and non-marine palynomorphs (Cole and Harding, 1998; Waterhouse, 1999). Copestake (pers. comm. in Parkinson, 1996) noted a significant incursion of benthic foraminifera near the top of the Blue Lias Formation. Among the non-benthic fauna ammonites are the most conspicuous element, and many, particularly the schlotheimiids and coroniceratids, attain a large size. They are sufficiently common and well preserved to have allowed a detailed biostratigraphical subdivision to be developed with the identification of several ammonite-correlated horizons in the Hettangian and Sinemurian stages (Page, 1992, 1994a, 2002). Other non-benthic invertebrate macrofossils are much rarer. They include the belemnite Nannobelus and the pseudoplanktonic crinoid Pentacrinites doreckae, which has been found in an exquisite state of preservation comparable with examples of the better-known P. fossilis from higher in the succession. Vertebrate remains, other than occasional disarticulated teeth and bones, are rare but the Blue Lias Formation and overlying Shales-with-Beef Member along this stretch of coast has furnished many type specimens of fish and marine reptile (Benton and Spencer, 1995; Dineley and Metcalf 1999). Many specimens were obtained by early collectors such as Mary Alining, but articulated skeletons are still being found.
The Blue Lias Formation is succeeded by a substantial thickness of mudstone-dominated strata, the Charmouth Mudstone Formation, which has as its type section the cliffs and foreshore of Black Ven and Stonebarrow
The Shales-with-Beef Member contains a few limestone beds, most of which are nodular and/or laterally impersistent. Several contain well-preserved ammonites from which they take their names, as in the Brooki Bed (Bed 74d), the Black Arnioceras (or Hartmanni) Bed (Bed 74f) and the Birchi Nodular (Bed 75a)
The base of the Black Ven Marl Member (Lang and Spath, 1926) is taken at the base of the Birchi Tabular (Bed 76a) and the top is defined by the hiatus above the Coinstone (Bed 89) on Stonebarrow, although a comparable development of hiatus concretions has not been observed on Black Ven (Hesselbo and Palmer, 1992). The full thickness of the member is exposed on Black Ven and all except the lowest part on Stonebarrow. It comprises about 27 m of mostly dark-grey mudstones, with subordinate beds of nodular and tabular limestone
The highest part of the Black Ven Marl Member is perhaps the most intensely collected part of the entire Lower Jurassic succession, mostly for commercially valuable fossils such as ammonites
The Black Ven Marl sensu Lang was some 44 m thick, with the lower 27 m being lithologi-cally and stratigraphically continuous with the underlying Shales-with-Beef Member but distinct from the upper 16.8 m, which lies above a hiatus at about the level of the Coinstone (Bed 89). This hiatus represents a substantial stratigraphical break, encompassing part of the Stellare Subzone, the entire Denotatus Subzone, and all of the Oxynotum Zone. The strata that succeed it are lithologically distinct from the Black Ven Marl Member beneath and comprise dark-grey, often highly pyritic, mudstones. Although pyrite also is abundant in the Shales-with-Beef and Black Ven Marl members below the Coinstone, pyritic preservation of ammonites there is relatively uncommon and, where it does occur, the pyrite usually occurs as a surface encrustation of a previously crushed ammonite. However, in the dark mudstones above the Coinstone, pyrite commonly occurs as well-preserved and uncrushed internal moulds of ammonites, bivalves and gastropods. The 16.8 m of dark mudstone above the Coinstone also lacks the large diagenetic nodules characteristic of the Black Ven Marl Member. The only prominent development of limestone is the Watch Ammonite Stone (Bed 99), a lenticular unit up to 0.3 m thick and often packed with abundant Echioceras grp. aeneum lying at various angles to the bedding. Occasional small limestone nodules may be present at other levels. Thin seams of 'beef' are present but they too are on a greatly reduced scale compared with those in the Shales-with-Beef Member. It has been proposed (Page, pers. comm.) to re-name this part of the succession, spanning the lower part of the Raricostatum Zone (Densinodulum and Raricostatum subzones) and characterized by abundant uncrushed pyritic moulds of ammonites, as the Stonebarrow Pyritic Member. On this style of fossil preservation alone it can easily be distinguished from the superficially dark mudstones below and has been recognized at outcrop throughout southern England (e.g. Hollingworth et al., 1990; Simms, 2003b).
The fauna of the Stonebarrow Pyritic Member is dominated by ammonites such as Crucilobiceras, Eoderoceras, Echioceras and the distinctive Oxynoticeras lymense, whose uncrushed pyritized phragmocones are conspicuous and readily collected. A low-diversity benthic fauna of mostly thin-shelled, byssate epifaunal and free-living bivalves is present throughout much of the mudstone sequence (Sellwood, 1972). Benthic diversity is significantly higher in the Watch Ammonite Stone (Bed 99) and the bioturbated marl associated with it, and includes several genera of bivalves, gastropods and brachiopods, Including Gryphaea mccullochi, which otherwise is rare in the member, and 14 species of foraminifera (Barnard, 1950). Sellwood (1972) noted that the fossils are concentrated mainly in the top 0.09 m of the limestone, which has a lighter colour than the lower part, while the limestone lenticles themselves have a sharp contact with an overlying, intensely bioturbated, shell-hash rich in fragments of the crinoid Hispidocrinus schlumbergeri. A second small increase in benthic diversity occurs about 1.6 m below the base of Hummocky (Bed 103), where an abrupt change from laminated to more homogeneous mudstones is associated with the appearance of protobranch bivalves and an increased abundance of other species already present lower in the succession.
The abundant ammonites
The Stonebarrow Pyritic Member is overlain by the Belemnite Marl Member, a 23 m-thick succession of blue-grey, occasionally organic-rich, mudstones alternating with pale-grey, richly calcareous mudstones. These form the uppermost Lias precipice on Black Ven and on the western flank of Stonebarrow
Much of the remainder of the Belemnite Marl Member, more than three quarters of which lies within the Jamesoni Zone, comprises alternating pale and dark mudstone bands, which are clearly visible in the near-vertical cliffs on Black Ven and Stonebarrow
The rhythmicity conspicuous throughout much of the Belemnite Marl Member is less well-developed in the highest 4 m at the top of the member (Lang, 1917). The upper 2 m is dominated by dark, weakly laminated, organic-rich shales. At some levels, notably the thin Belemnite Bed (Bed 120c), belemnites are profuse, while pyritized ammonites are abundant in beds 120a–b. Storm scours up to 1 m wide and 0.1 m deep, and filled with debris of Isocrinus basaltiformis, belemnites, brachiopods and wood, are a conspicuous feature in this part of the succession. Jones et al. (1994) noted a sudden increase in the strontium isotope values at the level of the Belemnite Bed. The Belemnite Marl Member is capped by the Belemnite Stone (Bed 121), an irregular, pale grey-brown, richly bioclastic limestone seldom more than 0.15 m thick, which has yielded a Luridum Subzone fauna. Despite the condensed nature of the Ibex Zone here, the sequence of ammonite zonules is largely complete (Phelps, 1985).
Much of the Belemnite Marl Member contains a limited benthic assemblage. Some elements of the fauna, namely ammonites, belemnites, bivalves, gastropods and brachiopods, were described in Lang et al. (1928). Throughout the sequence only belemnites are common and well preserved. They are especially abundant in the Belemnite Bed (Bed 120c) and in the Belemnite Stone (Bed 121), and in the Inferior Belemnite Bed of Hesselbo and Jenkyns (1995) about 0.6 m lower in the succession. Belemnites in general are the most conspicuous fossils elsewhere in the member, which led Lang et al. (1928) to describe the stratigraphical succession of morphotypes (see Chapter 1). Ammonites usually are poorly preserved, either as pyritized phragmocones or mudstone impressions. There are no infaunal, semi-infaunal or protobranch bivalves, and Gryphaea also is absent. Only Plagiostoma, Parainoceramus ventricosus and thin-shelled pectinids are at all common. Barnard (1950) noted an extreme paucity of forminifera in this part of the succession. Disarticulated remains of Isocrinus basaltiform is are locally abundant in storm scours near the top of the Belemnite Marl Member. Brachiopods generally are rare except at two levels; in beds 111–114 and 118–119. In common with other organic-rich mudstones elsewhere in the Lias Group of Dorset, those that occur immediately below the Belemnite Stone (beds 119–120) have yielded well-preserved vertebrate remains including a new species of ichthyosaur (McGowan and Milner, 1999) and remains of Scelidosaurus (Ensom, 1987, 1989).
The Belemnite Stone is overlain by the Green Ammonite Mudstone Member, which comprises blue-grey mudstones
Ammonites are abundant in the Green Ammonite Mudstone Member and include species of Aegoceras, Oistoceras, Liparoceras and Tragophylloceras. Several species of Prodactylioceras, a relatively rare genus in the British Lias, occur in the middle part of the member. Lytoceras is very rare in the Green Ammonite Mudstone Member although it occurs commonly in the Belemnite Stone below and in the Three Tiers above. Phelps (1985) defined a series of fine-resolution ammonite zonules within the Ibex and Davoei zones based largely on the Dorset coast succession. He showed that all three subzones and the full sequence of zonules of the Davoei Zone are present in the GCR sections. The Maculatum Subzone at the base is much thinner than the Capricomus and Figulinum subzones. He also identified here a local Cymbites horizon between his Figulinum and Bifurcus zonules, the latter equivalent to the Occidentale and Monestieri zonules of
A diverse benthic fauna was recorded from the Green Ammonite Mudstone Member by Lang (1936), with several new species of bivalve, gastropod and brachiopod described by Cox (1936) and Muir-Wood (1936). Small gastropods are particularly abundant in the lowest few metres, together with the epibenthic bivalve Parainoceramus ventricosus, the echinoid Eodiadema minuta and the crinoids Isocrinus basaltiformis and Balanocrinus subteroides. Higher in the succession shallow-burrowing nuculid bivalves are the only common macro-benthos. Macfadyen (1941) recorded a total of 55 species of foraminifera, together with sparse ostracods, in the Green Ammonite Mudstone Member.
The Charmouth Mudstone Formation is succeeded by the Dyrham Formation, which equates approximately with the lower part of the Upper Pliensbachian Substage
Three well-cemented, fine-grained, muddy sandstones, each 0.5–1 m thick, form conspicuous marker bands in the lowest part of the Dyrham Formation. They form prominent ledges in the cliffs and have long been known as the "Three Tiers'. Each has a gradational boundary with the intervening, less cemented, silty and sandy mudstones and, although often well-bioturbated with conspicuous Thalassinoides (Sellwood et al., 1970), show planar and ripple bedding. Above the Upper Tier lies about 60 m of grey, micaceous, silty mudstone, the Eype Clay Member, in which there are a few thin sandstone beds
Near the top of the Eype Clay Member is Day's Shell Bed, an indurated shelly and crinoidal mudstone less than 0.3 m thick with occasional small calcareous nodules. It has yielded an abundant and diverse benthic fauna together with ammonites and belemnites, described by Palmer (1966), many of which are immature individuals.
About 1 m above Day's Shell Bed a conspicuous fine-grained sandstone, the Starfish Bed, marks the base of the Down Cliff Sand Member. The Starfish Bed is a composite unit about 1 m thick that comprises several distinct beds, each of which has a sharp base succeeded by planar-laminated sands. The sands are locally rippled or show hummocky cross-stratification, and become increasingly bioturbated upwards. The ophiuroids, from which the Starfish Bed gets its name, are confined to the sole of the lowermost of these units (Goldring and Stephenson, 1972). Most are immature individuals of Palaeocoma milleri, with a second species referred to by Hess (1960) as Ophioderma tenuibrachiata. Scattered remains of the crinoid Balanocrinus gracilis also occur together with rare examples of the asteroid Tropidaster pectinatus. Ensom (1988) recorded siltstone dykes in fallen blocks of the Starfish Bed near Eype Mouth, though not on Thorncombe Beacon farther to the west. The Down Cliff Sand Member consists mainly of grey-brown sandy mudstones, becoming more sandy towards the top. It contains many indurated lenticles (Howarth, 1957), some of which contain abundant superbly preserved examples of Balanocrinus gracilis and Palaeocoma milleri (Simms, 1989), together with rarer examples of the ophiuroid Hemieuryale lunaris and the asteroids Tropidaster pectinatus, Archastropecten and Solaster (C. Moore, pers. comm.). Sellwood et al. (1970) noted abundant trace fossils and the presence, locally, of load structures on the sole of some beds. Wilson et al.(1958) cited a thickness of about 30 m for the Down Cliff Sand Member below Thorncombe Beacon, thinning eastwards to about 22 m near Eype Mouth. The Margaritatus Stone, a 0.3 m-thick bluish fossiliferous sandy limestone, is the only conspicuous marker band within the member and defines its top, although Wilson et al. (1958) noted several other minor marker horizons within the member. The ammonite fauna shows this bed to correspond to the base of the Subnodosus Subzone. Sellwood et al. (1970) described the Margaritatus Stone as a complex conglomeratic bed with angular sandstone blocks up to 0.6 m long as well as rolled and bored bioclasts and lithoclasts.
The Margaritatus Stone is succeeded by the Thorncombe Sand Member. This is mostly more yellow-weathering and homogeneous than the Down Cliff Sand Member, and contains conspicuous cemented 'doggers', up to 2 m thick and 3 m across at several levels, together with a 0.3 m-thick sandy limestone about midway up the succession. The sands frequently exhibit bioturbated units interbedded with hummocky cross-stratification (Sellwood et al., 1970). The basal 2 m of the member is a blue-grey mudstone, termed the 'Blue Band' or 'Margaritatus Clay'. The top 2.3 m of the member also is of grey mudstone. This is overlain by the Thorncombiensis Bed, a 0.36 m-thick bipartite unit of highly bioclastic limestone and calcareous mudstone that yields an ammonite assemblage indicative of the Gibbosus Subzone. Fossils, notably amaltheid ammonites (Howarth, 1957), rhynchonellid brachiopods (Ager, 1956–1967) and crinoids (Simms, 1989), are locally abundant. Lord (1974) recorded some 40 species of ostracod from from the clays and silts of the Margaritatus Zone, with species of Ogmoconcha particularly abundant.
The base of the Beacon Limestone Formation (= Junction Bed sensu lato of earlier authors) rests on an erosion surface at the top of the Thorncombe Sand Member. At West Cliff the Thorncombiensis Bed and overlying clays are absent and the Beacon Limestone Formation contains large blocks of Thorncombiensis Bed at its base (Howarth, 1957). The Beacon Limestone Formation is exposed only in the cliffs between Seatown and West Cliff and is rarely accessible in situ; its type locality is on Thorncombe Beacon
The Eype Mouth Limestone Member is overlain by the Down Cliff Clay Member of the Bridport Sand Formation
There is a progressive increase in grain size from the silty clays of the Down Cliff Clay Member, through siltstones to fine sand about the middle of the Bridport Sand Formation and then a decrease again towards the top (Hesselbo and Jenkyns, 1995). This grain-size pattern is roughly coincident with an increase, and then decrease, in bed spacing upwards through the succession. Calcite-cemented bands and 'doggers' are a conspicuous feature of weathered exposures of the Bridport Sand Formation
Identifiable fossil material is generally sparse in the Bridport Sand Formation except in the uppermost beds, which are packed with ammonites and other fossils. Buckman (1910) and Jackson (1926) recorded impressions of the ammonite Dumortieria in the Down Cliff Clay Member, but generally only the more robust calcitic fossil material such as belemnites (Doyle, 1990–1992) and crinoids (Simms, 1989) have survived. There has been little work on the microfauna, though Lord (1974) recovered ten species of ostracod from the lower part of the Down Cliff Clay Member.
Interpretation
The Lias Group on the Dorset coast has been the subject of intense collecting and research for at least two centuries. An outline of the ammonite sequence was already well-established by the time Lang and his co-authors (1914 to 1936) described the stratigraphy in this area. Subsequent stratigraphical work has served to refine the earlier stratigraphical schemes and define the position of the biostratigraphical and lithostratigraphical boundaries.
The base of the Lias Group and of the Blue Lias Formation was placed by Lang (1924) at the base of a conspicuous paper shale (Bed H1), which rests on an erosion surface at the top of the limestones of the Langport Member (formerly White Lias) of the Penarth Group (Wignall, 2001). This boundary was formerly taken to mark the base of the Jurassic System, but this is now defined by the first appearance of the ammonite Psiloceras, which at Pinhay Bay occurs in Lang's Bed H25 (Cope et al., 1980a).
The junction of the Blue Lias Formation and the overlying Charmouth Mudstone Formation was originally placed by Lang (1924; Lang et al., 1923) at Table Ledge (Bed 53). However, this boundary is well above the onset of mudstone-dominated deposition and accordingly it is now placed at an erosion surface at the top of Grey Ledge (Bed 49), which marks the upper limit of closely spaced limestones in the type section. The junction between the Shales-with-Beef and the Black Ven Marl members is taken at the base of the Birchi Tabular (Bed 76a) at an upward change from predominantly organic-rich to carbonate-rich mudstones. A significant boundary, and hiatus representing at least three ammonite subzones, lies within the Black Ven Marls of Lang and Spath (1926) at about the level of the Coinstone (Bed 89). Although the dark-grey mudstones above the hiatus resemble those below, they lack the large diagenetic limestone nodules and are much richer in pyritized ammonites. This same facies can be recognized elsewhere in the Wessex Basin and in the Severn Basin, and at its maximum development spans the Oxynotum and Raricostatum zones. Accordingly Page (pers. comm.) has proposed that the Black Ven Marl Member be emended to include only the lower part of the succession beneath the Coinstone, with the pyritic ammonite-rich mudstones above being re-named as the 'Stonebarrow Pyritic Member'.
The position of the Sinemurian–Pliensbachian boundary has been the subject of some debate. Lang et al. (1928) placed the boundary below the upper part of Hummocky (Bed 103b) but, based on later discoveries, Cope et al. (1980a) placed it at the base of the Apoderoceras Limestone (Bed 105), as did Page (1992). However, Hesselbo and Jenkyns (1995) maintained that Hummocky and the clays above Hummocky (beds 103 and 104) accumulated during extensive reworking of Raricostatum Zone sediments in earliest Pliensbachian times and hence the boundary should be drawn at the base of Hummocky (below Bed 103a). The boundary between the Belemnite Marl and Green Ammonite Mudstone members is clearly defined, both lithostratigraphically and biostratigraphically, by the top of the Belemnite Stone, which is coincident with the Ibex–Davoei zonal boundary.
The junction between the Charmouth Mudstone Formation, and hence also the Green Ammonite Mudstone Member, and the succeeding Dyrham Formation is placed immediately below the lowest of the Three Tiers at the base of the Eype Clay Member, one of three members within the formation. This is not quite coincident with the base of the Upper Pliensbachian Substage, which is marked by the first appearance of amaltheid ammonites about 3 m below the top of the Charmouth Mudstone Formation. The base of the Down Cliff Sand Member is drawn at the base of the Starfish Bed, with the base of the Thorncombe Sand Member placed at the top of the Margaritatus Stone. An erosion-surface contact with the highly condensed Marlstone Rock Member marks the junction of the Dyrham Formation with the Beacon Limestone Formation. The Marlstone Rock Member has yielded ammonites indicating both subzones of the Spinatum Zone and all but the Clevelandicum Subzone of the Tenuicostatum Zone (Howarth, 1980). The vertical extent of pale, fine-grained limestones of the overlying Eype Mouth Limestone Member clearly define its boundaries. The member is highly condensed and incorporates representatives of nearly all of the Toarcian zones and subzones. Howarth (1980) noted that there was no evidence for the presence of the lower part of the Exaratum Subzone. However, the presence of ammonites in the neptunian fissures caused considerable difficulties of interpretation for some of the earlier accounts (Buckman, 1922; Jackson, 1922, 1926) and was not satisfactorily resolved until the work of Jenkyns and Senior (1977, 1991). The base of the overlying Bridport Sand Formation is clearly drawn above the topmost limestone bed of the Beacon Limestone Formation and, although more than ten times as thick as the latter formation, It represents only the uppermost two ammonite zones of the Toarcian Stage. A distinct hiatus marks the boundary with the succeeding Middle Jurassic succession.
There has been considerable discussion concerning the primary or secondary (diagenetic) nature of some of the conspicuously rhythmic sequences developed in the Lias Group of Dorset. Richardson (in Lang et al., 1923) proposed a secondary origin for both the Blue Lias Formation limestones and the limestone nodules higher in the succession. Hallam (1957) and Simpson (1957) described evidence, particularly from trace fossils, for an essentially primary origin for the limestones although subsequently Hallam (1960a, 1964a) conceded that many of the limestones in the Blue Lias Formation were accentuated to some degree by diagenetic segregation. More recently Hallam (1986) proposed that many may have formed solely through rhythmic unmixing of calcium carbonate during diagenesis. Bottrell and Raiswell (1989) concluded from a study of pyrite abundance and sulphur-isotope composition that the limestone–mudstone rhythms reflected primary differences in the carbonate content of the sediment, which subsequently exerted a direct effect on the diagenetic accentuation of the carbonate-rich units. They noted that diagenetic cementation would be enhanced by a hiatus in sedimentation. Moghadam and Paul (2000) concluded that the limestone units were entirely diagenetic, but that the rhythmicity evident in the Blue Lias Formation reflected primary differences in the sediment rather than the effects of diagenetic unmixing. Hesselbo and Jenkyns (1995) have suggested that a few of the limestones, notably beds H4 and H30, may have been deposited from submarine mudflows, analogous to those seen in the Langport Member (formerly White Lias) at the western end of the GCR site (Hallam, 1969b), or from low-density turbidity currents.
Hallam (1960a, 1964a) suggested that the rhythmicity in the Blue Lias Formation might reflect epeirogenic oscillations in sea level. Others have suggested climatic control related to Milankovitch orbital cycles (House, 1985; Weedon, 1986, 1987; Smith, 1989; Weedon et al., 1999). Waterhouse (1999) described paly-nofacies cycles in the Blue Lias Formation that appear independent of lithology and which may also be linked to Milankovitch cycles. Cole and Harding (1998) found a close correspondence between palynofacies cycles and transgressive–regressive sequence boundaries in the Charmouth Mudstone Formation. Bessa and Hesselbo (1997) noted cyclicity in their gamma-ray log for the Belemnite Marl Member reflecting variable calcium carbonate contents through the succession. Supposed Milankovitch cyclicity has also been described from beds 110 to 117 (Polymorphus to Jamesoni subzones) in the Belemnite Marl Member (Weedon and Jenkyns, 1990, 1999). Bioturbation and changes in the body-fossil and trace-fossil assemblages in parallel with the light-dark couplets indicate a primary origin for these cycles, which they considered had experienced less diagenetic modification than the Blue Lias Formation. Weedon and Jenkyns (1990, 1999) identified at least two scales of cycle that they they interpreted as a 20 ka precession cycle and more irregular, larger amplitude, climatic variations. Van Buchem and McCave (1989) documented a strikingly similar succession of light-dark sediment couplets in the Banded Shales, also spanning the Polymorphus to Jamesoni subzones, of the Redcar Mudstone Formation at Robin Hood's Bay. They too suggested a periodicity of 20 ka for each couplet. House (1986) has identified analogous rhythms elsewhere in the Lias succession, specifically in the Shales-with-Beef Member and Bridport Sand Formation. In both cases there is evidence for at least some diagenetic accentuation of the cyclicity. Hesselbo and Jenkyns (1995) also identified small-scale, coarsening-upward cycles in the Bridport Sand Formation. Diagenetically cemented bands within this formation also display a conspicuous rhythmicity but Davies (1967) suggested that the cementation reflected primary differences in the detrital carbonate content of the sediments.
Evidence for a diagenetic origin is clearer for many of the limestones in the Shales-with-Beef and Black Ven Marl members, most of which are discontinuous and nodular. Many are laminated or have a septarian structure, and the frequent presence of beautifully preserved uncrushed ammonites indicates nodule formation at shallow burial depth before compaction. Raiswell (1971) considered that the Birchi Nodules (Bed 75)
The development of early diagenetic limestone nodules in the Shales-with-Beef and Black Ven Marl members contrasts with their scarcity in the Stonebarrow Pyritic Member. Conversely, although pyrite is common in all three members it is only in the Stonebarrow Pyritic Member that it commonly occurs as uncrushed pyritic moulds of ammonites and other fossils, indicating early diagenetic formation. In the Shales-with-Beef and Black Ven Marl members it more typically occurs as nodules and encrustations of already crushed ammonites, indicating formation later in diagenesis. Both pyrite and early diagenetic carbonate nodules form in the sulphate reduction zone but differences in the development of these in the mudstones above and below the Coinstone hiatus may reflect differences in sedimentation rates and probably in benthic oxygen levels. Precipitation of pyrite is inhibited by rapid burial of organic-rich sediment, since this allows insufficient time for the necessary downward diffusion of sulphate (Curtis, 1995). Downward diffusion rates of sulphate will also be slowed significantly by the exclusion of burrowing benthos, which is a consequence of benthic anoxia, since burrows provide potential diffusion routes for sulphate ions. Consequently, pyritization of fossil material in the Shales-with-Beef and Black Ven Marl members tends to occur at a relatively late stage, after the fossils have been crushed by sediment compaction. However, benthic anoxia does seem to favour the precipitation of very early diagenetic calcite concretions in which the ammonites are uncrushed; these are a conspicuous feature of many organic-rich mudstone units at this site, particularly in the Shales-with-Beef and Black Ven Marl members, but are also a significant component of organic-rich successions at other GCR sites, notably those in the Toarcian succession on the Yorkshire coast. There are at least two horizons in the Dorset Lias, the Coinstone (Bed 89) of the Black Ven Marl Member and the Eype Nodule Bed of the Eype Clay Member, where early diagenetic calcite concretions locally have a pyrite skin. In both instances this is associated with a history of burial, exhumation and re-burial, thereby allowing two distinct periods of sulphate reduction to occur at these horizons. Observations made by Hesselbo and Palmer (1992) indicate that this pyritization did not occur during the exhumation phase but was associated with, or shortly preceded, re-burial by the mudstones of the Stonebarrow Pyritic Member. These examples may be analogous to some of the pyrite-skinned carbonate nodules noted in the Jet Rock of the Mulgrave Shale Member on the Yorkshire coast (Hallam, 1962a; Coleman and Raiswell, 1981), such as at the Staithes to Port Mu'grave GCR site.
The development of discontinous layers and lenses, or seams, of fibrous calcite, or 'beef', within parts of the Dorset Lias, notably in the Shales-with-Beef Member, has long elicited debate. Richardson (in Lang et al., 1923) recognized that the 'beef' seams post-dated the carbonate nodules and concluded that the 'beef' was deposited by downwardly percolating carbonate solutions into cracks that had opened as a result of the desiccation and contraction of the shales. It is now thought that 'beef' seams form as a result of rapid over-pressuring of organic-rich shales at burial depths of several tens to hundreds of metres, within the methanogenic zone (Marshall, 1982; Stoneley, 1983). On the Dorset coast, about 100 m above the Shales-with-Beef Member lies the base of the Dyrham Formation, of which the lowest 93 m (the Eype Clay and Down Cliff Sand members) was deposited during just one ammonite subzone (Stokesi Subzone)
The Dorset Lias has been important for understanding the varied nature of stratigraphical hiatuses, the processes by which they are formed, and the various techniques by which they can be detected. That associated with the Coinstone (Bed 89) is among the best documented of these. Hesselbo and Palmer (1992) attribute the exhumation of the carbonate nodules in large part to bio-erosion but could not decide whether this event reflected lower sea level or reduced sediment supply. Hallam (1969, 1999) favoured the former and cited the absence of any associated condensed facies as evidence against sediment starvation. Further examples include the hiatus at the top of the Watch Ammonite Stone (Bed 99), the top of Hummocky (Bed 103) (Sellwood, 1972) and, in the Upper Pliensbachian, the Eype Nodule Bed (Ensom, 1985b), the Margaritatus Stone (Sellwood et al., 1970) and others noted by Wilson et al. (1958). The Beacon Limestone Formation, encompassing the top of the Pliensbachian Stage and much of the Toarcian Stage, is highly condensed and contains spectacular hiatuses with ammonites and other fossils abruptly truncated along some surfaces (Jackson, 1922, 1926; Jenkyns and Senior, 1977, 1991). Many hiatuses elsewhere in the Lias are less obvious, with no evidence of a major biostratigraphical break or lithological change. They may be indicated by concentrations of obdurate fossils, such as belemnites, or by reworked lithoclasts, or an intensely burrowed horizon. Examples include the erosion hiatus surfaces at Grey Ledge (Bed 49), in the mudstones of Bed 83 (Hesselbo and Jenkyns, 1995), and at the top of the Belemnite Bed (Bed 120c). Jones et al. (1994) also found evidence in the strontium isotope record for a hiatus at this last horizon. More tenuously, Smith (1989) suggested, on the basis of correlation of presumed Milankovitch cycles, that there was a hiatus within the Angulata Zone of the Blue Lias Formation on the Dorset coast that is not present in equivalent strata in the Somerset coast section.
The Dorset Lias has contributed a great deal to our understanding of the effects of syn-sedimentary fault movement and its manifestation in the geological record. One example is the westward thinning of the Belemnite Marl Member and the Green Ammonite Mudstone Member away from the Eypemouth Fault. The Bridport Sand Formation has been cited as an exception to this westward thinning, showing a distinct thickening westwards from East Cliff to Thorncombe Beacon (Hesselbo and Jenkyns, 1995). However, this supposed exception does not take into account the fact that different stretches of the coastline are being compared. The sections through the Belemnite Marl and Green Ammonite Mudstone members referred to all lie to the west of the Eypemouth Fault, known to have been active during Early Jurassic times (Jenkyns and Senior, 1977, 1991), whereas the Bridport Sand Formation exposures are located both to east and west of the fault. Hence the apparent westward thickening of the latter formation may reflect thickness differences across the fault rather than being analogous with the eastward thickening of the Belemnite Marl and Green Ammonite Mudstone members. More direct evidence of syn-sedimentary movement comes from the correlation of individual marker bands across specific faults. Various authors (Lang, 1945; Hallam, 1969; Hesselbo and Palmer, 1992) noted that whereas there was a hiatus directly above the Coinstone (Bed 89) on Stonebarrow, the same hiatus occurred more than 1 m above the level of the Coinstone on Black Ven. Similarly, the difficulties of tracing several of the nodule bands in the Obtusum Zone from Black Ven to Stonebarrow, a problem noted by Lang and Spath (1926), may be attributable to erosive removal of the Woodstone (Bed 83f) and Lower Flatstones (Bed 83d) horizons on Stonebarrow. This is suggested by a hiatus surface above the Pavior (Bed 82) at the latter site (Hesselbo and Jenkyns, 1995). Both the Coinstone and Pavior hiatuses may indicate syn-sedimentary movement on the nearby Char Fault.
The Eypemouth Fault at the eastern end of the GCR site has provided some of the most convincing evidence for syn-sedimentary faulting Genkyns and Senior, 1977, 1991). As the fault is approached from the west the Eype Mouth Limestone Member thickens dramatically, from less than 0.5 m to as much as 3.5 m over a distance of less than 0.5 kin, and is cut by many sediment-filled 'neptunian' sills and dykes. These formed as a result of tectonic stresses associated with fault movements and allowed ammonites and other fossils to become intercalated, out of sequence, into older parts of the succession. Ensom's (1988) observations of siltstone dykes cutting the Starfish Bed near Eype Mouth, and their absence from this same unit farther west, provides further evidence of syn-sedimentary movement on this fault and the extent of its influence on surrounding sediments.
The relationship between syn-sedimentary movement on faults and the development of erosional hiatuses is exemplified by the diachronous nature of the hiatus surface associated with the Eype Nodule Bed. As the Eypemouth Fault is approached from the west the sequence shows an initial incorporation of nodules into the base of the overlying sandstone, then the pinching out of the sandstone and development of pyritic rims on the nodules, and finally evidence of exhumation and encrustation of nodules adjacent to the fault.
There have been few broad-based palaeoenvironmental interpretations of the Lias of Dorset, largely because the mudstone-dominated nature of much of the succession has deterred investigations of this type. Hesselbo and Jenkyns (1998) provide the only general account, describing the succession in terms of sequence stratigraphy and relative sea level. They have interpreted the organic-rich mudstones, such as those of the Shales-with-Beef and Black Ven Marl members, as deposited during periods of sea-level rise or highstand, and the erosional hiatuses associated with the Coinstone and the Hummocky horizons to represent sediment starvation during deepening events. In the Belemnite Marl Member, they attributed the condensed nature of the Belemnite Bed to shallowing, and condensation in the Belemnite Stone to deepening. They concluded that the facies developed at any particular level reflect the interplay of a variety of factors.
Some of the sandier units in the Lias have been specifically discussed and some general observations and interpretations can be made for other parts of the succession or extrapolated from contiguous strata. Goldring and Stephenson (1972) concluded that the exceptional preservation of the ophiuroids in the Starfish Bed at the base of the Down Cliff Sand Member was due to burial by a sudden influx of sand that was thick enough to prevent subsequent disruption of the remains by bioturbation. The load structures reported by Sellwood et al. (1970) from other levels in the Down Cliff Sand Member also suggest rapid sedimentation. A similar mechanism can be invoked for the occurrence of most intact echinoderms throughout the Lias Group of Dorset, including other occurrences of intact crinoids, ophiuroids and asteroids from the Eype Clay Member and intact examples of the echinoid Miocidaris lobatum and the ophiuroid Palaeocoma escberi from the Blue Lias Formation. In other parts of the sucession the presence of intact multi-element skeletons, such as echinoderms and vertebrates, is due largely to preservation in anoxic or dysaerobic benthic environments. The organic-rich parts of the Shales-with-Beef and Black Ven Marl members are developed in such facies and have proven an important source of well-preserved marine reptiles and fish. Simms (1986) demonstrated that the extraordinary preservation of the crinoid Pentacrinites fossilis in the Black Ven Marl Member was also due to benthic anoxia, though current winnowing of the upper surfaces of these specimens demonstrated that conditions were not entirely stagnant and that sedimentation rates were low. Although very low levels of bioturbation sometimes are present in these organic-rich mudstones, benthic bivalve larvae did not generally survive spatfall except during brief periods of more oxygenated conditions that allowed the development of thin shell pavements. In contrast, the pseudoplanktonic Pentacrinites was brought in on floating driftwood, which then sank to the anoxic sea floor. Simms (1999) has suggested that a current gyre may have developed across this area for a relatively brief period during the Obtusum Zone, trapping many crinoid-laden floating logs that eventually sank to form a relatively high concentration of specimens through some 2 m of the Black Ven Marl Member.
Dysaerobic benthic conditions appear to have been fairly prevalent in the basal part of the Blue Lias Formation on the Dorset coast, and in other areas such as the north Somerset coast. The fauna has a relatively low diversity dominated by the bivalve Liostrea bisingeri and the slender-spirted echinoids Diademopsis and Eodiadema, presumably tolerant of low oxygen levels. The echinoids typically are disarticulated but intact material occurs in some laminated shales, suggesting that benthic oxygen levels periodically dropped still further.
Despite the overwhelming dominance of marine organisms in the Lias at this GCR site, fossil evidence for a nearby landmass is also present. Fossil driftwood occurs sporadically thoughout the Lias Group, but it is particularly abundant in the upper part of the Shales- with-Beef and Black Ven Marl members, where trunks up to nearly 4 m long have been recorded (Macfadyen, 1970). This part of the succession has also yielded a rich fauna of insects, which are otherwise virtually unrepresented in the Dorset Lias, and several specimens of the ornithischian dinosaur Scelidosaurus. Whalley (1985) postulated that the preservation of the insects indicated a landmass less than 80 km away, perhaps an extension of the Cornubian Massif to the west (
The Bridport Sand Formation has been the subject of several palaeoenvironmental analyses. More than a century ago (Buckman, 1889) showed that the Toarcian sands of south-west England were diachronous and younged to the south. Davies (1969) proposed that the sands represented a large migrating sand-bar while others have suggested deposition in a lower or middle shoreface environment above storm wave-base (Colter and Harvard, 1981; Hounslow, 1987; Bryant et al., 1988). More recently, Pickering (1995) proposed that broadly undulating cemented bands near the base of the Bridport Sand Formation formed as near-symmetrical scours beneath standing waves in shallow water, while Hesselbo and Jenkyns (1995) suggested that they are predominantly aggradational and formed as ridges at the toe of an advancing sand slope. The well-cemented layers have been interpreted as tempestites and have a significantly lower clay content than the uncemented layers. This suggests that their higher permeability allowed earlier cementation of these horizons (Bryant et al., 1988).
The Lias succession in Dorset has long served as a standard against which other Lower Jurassic successions in Britain and farther afield have been compared. The most recent lithostratigraphical comparison was by Hesselbo and Jenkyns (1995), between the Dorset succession and that exposed on the Yorkshire coast. Although some eustatic signals are evident in both basins, they noted a relationship between several of the facies units in the two areas in which a coarser-grained unit in one basin would be represented by a finer-grained one in the other basin and vice versa. Assuming the same sea-level histories for both areas they explained these differences in terms of proximal and distal settings and the role of local tectonics in creating accommodation space for sediment.
Faunal differences between the Dorset Lias and correlative strata in other basins have formed the basis of several palaeobiogeographical studies and established the existence of distinct provinces for several groups of fossils, notably ammonites (Howarth, 1958) and brachiopods (Ager, 1956a).
Conclusions
The Dorset coastline between Pinhay Bay and Fault Corner, and the separate GCR site of East Cliff provides unparalleled and readily accessible exposures through the entire Lower Jurassic succession. The site has been investigated and collected from for more than 200 years and has played an important role in the development of geology as a science and in the sub-disciplines of palaeontology and stratigraphy. As such it has been of fundamental importance in establishing a biostratigraphy for the marine Lower Jurassic Series and has also furnished an impressive diversity of type specimens of both vertebrate and invertebrate fossils. It continues to be of outstanding importance as a source of fossil material. It incorporates lithostratigraphical type sections and has contributed significantly to an understanding of the relative roles of climate, sea-level change, syn-sedimentary faulting and diagenesis on preserved sedimentary sequences. The organic-rich horizons within the succession are oil-source rocks for the richest onshore oilfield in Britain, at Wytch Farm, and hence have been much studied.