Jarzembowski, E.A., Siveter, D.J., Palmer, D. & Selden, P.A. 2010. Fossil Arthropods of Great Britain. Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 35, JNCC, Peterborough.
The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
E.A. Jarzembowski Maidstone Museum & Bentlif Art Gallery, Maidstone, UK
Derek J. Siveter Oxford University Museum, Oxford, UK
D. Palmer Cambridge, UK
and
P.A. Selden Department of Earth Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
GCR Editors: Larry Thomas and Neil Ellis
Published by the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Monkstone House, City Road, Peterborough, PE1 1JY, UK
First edition 2010 © 2010 Joint Nature Conservation Committee
Typeset in 10/12pt Garamond ITC by JNCC Printed in Great Britain by Hobbs The Printers, Totton. ISBN 978–1-86107–486–7
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the UK Copyright Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may not be reproduced, stored, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction only in accordance with the terms of the licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK, or in accordance with the terms and licences issued by the appropriate Reproduction Rights Organization outside the UK. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to the GCR Team, JNCC.
The publisher makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy of the information contained in this book and cannot accept any legal responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions that may be made.
British Geological Survey Copyright protected materials
1. The copyright of materials derived from the British Geological Survey's work is vested in the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). No part of these materials (geological maps, charts, plans, diagrams, graphs, cross-sections, figures, sketch maps, tables, photographs) may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, or stored in a retrieval system of any nature, without the written permission of the copyright holder, in advance.
2. To ensure that copyright infringements do not arise, permission has to be obtained from the copyright owner. In the case of BGS maps this includes both BGS and the Ordnance Survey. Most BGS geological maps make use of Ordnance Survey topography (Crown Copyright), and this is acknowledged on BGS maps. Reproduction of Ordnance Survey materials may be independently permitted by the licences issued by Ordnance Survey to many users. Users who do not have an Ordnance Survey licence to reproduce the topography must make their own arrangments with the Ordnance Survey, Copyright Branch, Romsey Road, Southampton SO9 4DH (Tel. 01703 792913).
3. Permission to reproduce BGS materials must be sought in writing from the Intellectual Property Rights Manager, British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG (Tel. 0115 936 3100).
Acknowledgements
Access to the countryside
Conserving our fossil heritage — JNCC policy statement
Preface N. V Ellis
1 An Introduction to the fossil arthropods of Great Britain D. Palmer
Introduction
Arthropod anatomy
Arthropod systematics and evolution
History of investigation
Early arthropod evolution and the Cambrian 'explosion'
Terrestrialization
Fossil evidence for herbivory in arthropods
Arthropods — the development of flight
Taphonomy and preservation potential
Insects as climate indicators
GCR site selection
GCR sites in palaeogeographical context
2 Pre-Carboniferous fossil arthropods
Pre-Carboniferous geological history D. Palmer
Dunside, South Lanarkshire Derek J. Siveter
Gutterford Burn, East Lothian and Midlothian Derek J. Siveter
Slot Burn, Ayrshire Derek J. Siveter
Turin Hill, Angus Derek J. Siveter
Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire Derek J. Siveter and D. Palmer
Church Hill, Herefordshire Derek J. Siveter
The Whitcliffe, Shropshire Derek.J. Siveter
Ludford Lane and Ludford Corner, Shropshire Derek. J. Siveter
Tin Mill Race, Shropshire Derek J. Siveter
Perton Lane, Herefordshire Derek J. Siveter
Bradnor Hill, Herefordshire Derek J. Siveter
Rhynie Chert, Aberdeenshire P.A. Selden
3 Post-Devonian fossil arthropods P.A. Selden
Post-Devonian upper palaeozoic history
Foulden, Borders
Glencartholm, Dumfries and Galloway
Granton Shore, Lothian
East Kirkton, Lothian
Writhlington, Avon
4 Mesozoic fossil arthropods E.A. Jarzembowski and D. Palmer
Introduction
Regional setting
Aust Cliff, Avon
Charmouth–Pinhay Bay, Dorset
Dumbleton and Alderton, Gloucestershire
Stonesfield, Oxfordshire
Poxwell, Dorset
Durlston Bay, Dorset
Teffont Evias, Wiltshire
Dinton, Wiltshire
Clockhouse Brickworks, Surrey
Auclaye, Surrey
Smokejacks Brickworks, Surrey
5 The palaeoentomology of Tertiary (Cenozoic) strata in Great Britain
E.A. Jarzembowski and D. Palmer
Introduction
Palaeoclimates and palaeo-enviroments
Palaegeographical setting
Stratigraphical background
Ardtun, Strathclyde
Cold Ash, Berkshire
Bognor Regis, West Sussex
Gurnard, Hampshire
St Helens, Hampshire
Bouldnor, Hampshire
References
Glossary
Index
The initial site selection and site documentation for the sites that are described in this volume were coordinated largely by Dr E.A. Jarzembowski (for 'Palaeontomology') in the early 1980s, and Drs M. Rowlands and P A. Selden (for 'Arthropoda, excluding insects and trilobites') in the mid 1980s. Advice on site selection for these GCR 'Blocks' was of course received from many varied sources too numerous to mention here, but to all of those who were involved in site selection and description, grateful thanks is recorded. Ultimate guidance from the then Head of the GCR, Dr W.A. Wimbledon is acknowledged here also.
Diagrams were expertly drafted by Drs S.C. White and C.F. Pamplin (JS Publications, Newmarket), and the index was prepared by Mrs C. Tyler. Photographs originating from the Natural History Museum are reproduced by kind permission, and details of accreditation are to be found against each photograph in turn in the captions to the illustrations.
The authors thank all of those colleagues who read and commented on early drafts of the text, and we would particularly like to thank the JNCC production team for their assistance in the compilation of this volume; in particular Mr N. Ellis (GCR Publications Manager) and the GCR Production Editors, Miss E. Gubb, Miss A. Carter and Dr E. Durham, each of whom played a part in securing the final version of the typescript.
On behalf of all of the authors, we would like to record our thanks to the owners and managers of land and quarries who have allowed access to the sites, either during previous work or specifically for this GCR volume.
This volume is not intended for use as a field guide. The description or mention of any site should not be taken as an indication that access to a site is open. Most sites described are in private ownership, and their inclusion herein is solely for the purpose of justifying their conservation. Their description or appearance on a map in this work should not be construed as an invitation to visit. Prior consent for visits should always be obtained from the landowner and/or occupier.
Information on conservation matters, including site ownership, relating to Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) or National Nature Reserves (NNRs) in particular counties or districts may be obtained from the relevant country conservation agency headquarters listed below:
Countryside Council for Wales, Maes-y-Ffynnon, Penrhosgarnedd, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2DW.
Natural England, Northminster House, Peterborough PE 1 1UA.
Scottish Natural Heritage, Great Glen House, Leachkin Road Inverness N3 8NW.
Fossils are a key part of our natural heritage and a major scientific, educational and cultural resource. They are fundamental to understanding the evolution of life and the character of ancient environments. Fossils also provide a basis for comparing the ages of rocks the world over.
The discovery, collection and study of the fossilized remains of ancient life can be enjoyable and stimulating activities that give people a fascinating insight into the geological and biological history of the Earth. However, the available fossil resource is finite. It is only through maintaining a prudent approach to the management of important fossil sites that future generations will be able to experience, study and enjoy them.
In most circumstances, responsible fossil collecting is not harmful to the conservation of fossil sites. It can actually benefit our understanding of geology. This is particularly true where the fossils are relatively common or the sites in which they are found are subject to high levels of natural or artificial degradation, such as coastal cliffs that are being eroded, or quarries that are being actively worked. In such situations collecting fossil specimens that might otherwise be destroyed can be beneficial to science, provided that they are properly documented and made available for study. Responsible fossil collecting can therefore be a valuable activity in the sustainable management and safeguard of our fossil heritage.
Irresponsible collecting provides no scientific or educational gain and is therefore an unacceptable activity resulting in irreparable damage to our fossil heritage. It will pose a clear threat where fossils are rare or the fossil source is limited in extent, for example in a cave or a river channel deposit. Collecting without proper recording and curation, inexpert collecting, over-collecting and inappropriate use of power tools and heavy machinery are likely to reduce or even destroy the scientific value of such sites. Unless the activity is undertaken in an appropriate manner, the statutory nature conservation agencies, the Countryside Council for Wales, Environment and Heritage Service, Natural England and Scottish Natural Heritage, will oppose fossil collecting on the small number of Sites of Special Scientific Interest/Areas of Special Scientific Interest where this activity would-cause significant damage to the features of special interest.
Adopting a responsible approach to collecting is essential for conserving our fossil heritage. The basic principles set out below should be followed by all those intending to collect fossils.
Access and ownership — permission to enter private land and collect fossils must always be gained and local bylaws should be obeyed. A clear agreement should be made over the future ownership of any fossils collected.
Collecting — in general, collect only a few representative specimens and obtain these from fallen or loose material. Detailed scientific study will require collection of fossils in situ.
Site management — avoid disturbance to wildlife. Many invertebrates and lower plants live on or under loose rocks that should be replaced in their original positions whenever possible. Do not leave the site in an untidy or dangerous condition for those who follow.
Recording and curation — always record precisely the locality at which fossils are found and, if collected in situ, record relevant details of the position of the rock layer from where the fossil was collected. Ensure that these records can be directly related to the relevant specimens. Where necessary, seek specialist advice on specimen identification and care. Fossils of prime scientific importance should be placed in a suitable repository, normally a museum with adequate curatorial and storage facilities.
In order to achieve the successful management of the fossil heritage of the United Kingdom, the statutory nature conservation agencies will:
JNCC, 1997
There is such a diversity of rocks, minerals, fossils and landforms packed into the piece of the Earth's crust we call 'Britain' that it is difficult to be unimpressed by the long, complex history of geological change to which they are testimony. But if we are to improve our understanding of the nature of the geological forces that have shaped our islands, further unravel their history in 'deep time' and learn more of the history of life on Earth, we must ensure that the most scientifically important Earth science sites are conserved for future generations to study, research and enjoy. Moreover, as an educational field resource and as training grounds for new generations of geologists on which to hone their skills, it is essential that such sites continue to remain available for study. The first step in achieving this goal is to identify the key sites, which is a primary aim of the Geological Conservation Review (GCR).
The GCR, launched in 1977, is a world-first in the systematic selection and documentation of a country's best Earth science sites. No other country has attempted such a comprehensive and systematic review of its Earth science sites on anything near the same scale. After three decades of site evaluation, consultation with the scientific community, and site documentation, we now have an inventory of over 3000 GCR sites, selected for 100 categories covering the entire range of the geological and geomorphological features of Britain.
The minimum criterion for GCR site selection is that sites should offer the finest and/or the most representative feature for illustrating a particular aspect of geology or geomorphology. The resulting GCR sites are thus, at the very least, of national scientific importance and many of these include features regarded 'as either 'classic' (i.e. a 'textbook example'), internationally important, or simply 'unique'. Some are, in addition, visually spectacular.
The present volume is the 35th to be published in the GCR series of books, which, when complete, will stretch to more than 40 volumes and provide a vast geoconservation information resource. The volume, in describing the ultimately selected GCR sites, represents the results of that part of the GCR assessment and selection programme for Fossil Arthropods and Palaeoentomology. Both of these palaeontological themes provided the basis for site selection categories for the GCR. This volume summarizes the considerable research that has been undertaken on the localities and will be invaluable as an essential reference source for those engaged in their study and aims to provide a stimulus for further investigation. It will also be helpful to teachers and lecturers and for those people who, in one way or another, have a vested interest in the GCR sites: owners, occupiers, planners and those concerned with the practicalities of site conservation. The conservation value of the sites is mostly based on a specialist understanding of the Earth science features present and is, therefore, of a technical nature. The account of each site ends, however, with a brief summary of the geological interest, framed in less technical language, in order to help the non-specialist. The first chapter of the volume, used in conjunction with the glossary, is also aimed at a less specialist audience.
This volume deals with the state of knowledge of the sites available at the time of writing, and it must be seen in this context. There is still much to learn about the GCR sites documented here, in increasing our knowledge and understanding of geological history and processes. Geological studies, like any other science, are ever-developing, with new discoveries being made, and existing models being subject to continual testing and modification as new data comes to light. While the existing sites continue to enable us to add to our geological knowledge, increased or hitherto unrecognized significance may be seen in new sites. Indeed, during the writing of this volume, a number of additional localities were considered for inclusion and, after a period of assessment, were ultimately deemed to be worthy of GCR status and were included in this account. That fact is almost inevitable when one considers that some of the original networks of sites were drawn up over two decades ago.
Therefore, it is possible that further important sites will be identified in future years for the GCR as research continues. However, it must be stressed that the GCR is intended to be a minimalist scheme, with the selection of only the best, most representative, example of a geological feature, rather than the selection of a series of sites showing closely analogous features.
This account clearly demonstrates the value of the GCR sites to the study of fossil arthropods and their importance within the wider context of Britain's outstanding scientific and natural heritage, and I am grateful to the authors for their valuable contribution in assisting JNCC in its conservation goals.
N.V. Ellis, GCR Publications Manager and Geoconservation Adviser, JNCC January 2010