S Engering, S and Barron, H.F. (2007) Doncaster Geodiversity Assessment Volumes 1&2. British Geological Survey Commissioned Report CR/07/025N. For planning purposes consult Doncaster City Council The report is also available as a PDF download from NERC NORA
A33 D190–192 Blaxton Common
Site information
Site name: Blaxton Common
Site key: D190, D191, D192
Grid reference:
Site type: disused quarries, pits and cuttings
Local authority: Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council, South Yorkshire
Site dimensions: 1800 x 1500 m
Site owner: Tarmac Quarry Products
Conservation status: Regionally Important Geological Site Date: 16/9/97
Field surveyor: Scott Engering Date: 16/2/07
Stratigraphy and rock types
Time unit: Triassic Rock unit: Sherwood Sandstone Group
Rock type: Sandstone (undifferentiated) Details: Massive cross-bedded sandstone with marl pebbles
Time unit: Anglian, Middle Pleistocene Rock unit: Older River Gravel (River Terrace Deposits)
Rock type: Sand and Gravel Details: Cross-bedded sands and gravels
Site map
This map is based upon Ordnance Survey topographic material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of The Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: 100017897 [2007]
Site description
Large area of old sand and gravel pits that have long since been disused. The site is understood to be in multiple ownership but the only known owner is Tarmac, whose representative accompanied me on the visit to the Levels Lane Quarry. The principal feature of interest here is a large flooded pit with an exposure of up to 6 m of Sherwood Sandstone along the entire length of its western side. Photos taken from
The exposure is in effect now inaccessible. The entrance to the quarry is gated and is used by a farmer on adjoining land. Waterside exposure limits safe access to study rock.
The site is now much more overgrown than in the 1997 survey and exposures of the Older River Gravel are not easy to find. Many exposures are adjacent to flooded parts of the site and are thickly vegetated and are not generally safely accessible. Occasional exposures can be seen beneath tree roots as at
RIGS assessment of site value
Ratings: 1–2 very poor; 3–4 poor; 5–6 acceptable/useful; 7–8 quite good; 9–10 very good/excellent; N/A not applicable; D/K don't know
Access and safety
Aspect/Description/Rating
Road access & parking Very limited at gated entrance. 2-3 vehicles. Rating: 5
Safety of access Access along established footpaths pass close to flooded pits access across uneven ground and embankments. Rating: 5
Safety of exposure Sandstone inaccessible. Water hazards of flooded pits. Rating: 4
Permission to visit From Tarmac, although public footpaths cross the land. Rating: 5
Current condition Sandstone exposures clear and visible but Older River Gravels are increasingly becoming overgrown. Rating: 6
Current conflicting activities Vegetation growth
Restricting conditions Private ownership. health and safety hazards associated with water and steep, overgrown embankments
Nature of exposure Quarried faces
Multiple exposures/ prospect for trail Has potential for interpretation as a nature reserve
Notes Overgrown and potentially hazardous site
Culture, heritage & economic
Aspect/Description/Rating
Historic, archaeological & literary associations None known. Local industrial archaeology interest only. Rating: 5
Aesthetic landscape The area has been recolonised by plants and would make a good nature reserve. Rating: 6
History of earth sciences No associations known. Rating: 0
Economic geology Former sand and gravel extraction site. Potentially a good example of restoration and landscape. Rating: 7
Notes Limited value as part of industrial archaeology of the area
Education and science
Surface processes Erosional surfaces, fluvioglacial deposition and modern weathering and erosional processes. Rating: 6
Geomorphology Ancient erosional surface on Sherwood Sandstone. Rating: 7
Sedimentary A range of lithologies and sedimentary structures. Rating: 8
Fossils Not applicable. Rating: 0
Igneous Not applicable. Rating: 0
Metamorphic Not applicable. Rating: 0
Tectonic: structural Unconformity between Triassic and Quaternary. Rating: 0
Minerals Not applicable. Rating: 7
Stratigraphy Good site for correlating QuaternaryStratigraphy. Rating: 7
Notes Good exposures suitable for research, advanced students and group visits under supervision of experienced leader. Regeneration of vegetation at advanced stage
Geodiversity value
Links well with biodiversity interests, but lithologies not easily studied due to access difficulties. Rating: 7