Benton, M.J. & Spencer, P.S. 1995. Fossil Reptiles of Great Britain. Geological Conservation Review Series No. 10, JNCC, Peterborough, ISBN 0 412 62040 5.
The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Huntsman's Quarry, Naunton, is the best Cotswolds Slate locality, and source of six or seven species of reptiles. The fauna is comparable with that from Stonesfield, but occurs much further west, on the other side of a major palaeogeographic barrier.
Huntsman's Quarry is the only major quarry still working in the Cotswolds Slate (=Eyford Member), formerly equated with the Stonesfield Slate (see Stonesfield report). It lies 2 km northeast of Naunton on an unclassified road that crosses Eyford Hill. The quarry has yielded a wide range of fossil reptiles in the past and is currently operated by Huntsman Quarries Ltd for road-metal and gravel and has been extended much towards the north. The exact location of the older finds is unknown, but they were probably made in the older portions of the quarry, several of which still offer good exposures e.g.
The Cotswolds Slate was extensively worked for roofing slates in the 19th and early 20th century around Sevenhampton, Kineton, Naunton and Eyford (H.B. Woodward, 1894, pp. 294–6, 484–5; Richardson, 1929, pp. 102–16, 144–6; Arkell, 1933, p. 278). The fossil reptiles were examined by various Victorian authors and the fauna was reviewed by Richardson (1929), but the older, and more recent, finds are in need of redescription.
H.B. Woodward (1894, p. 295) provided a section at Summerhill, Eyford (?
| Thickness ft | in | |
| Limestone, grey, rather hard | seen 2 | 6 |
| Marl, grey and yellow; shell fragments-mostly of oysters; one specimen of Rhynchonella ?concinna | 0 | 6 |
| Limestone, yellowish, sparsely oolitic; Lima cardiiformis | 2 | 9 |
| 'The Crop'. Oolitic, grey, obliquely-laminated: makes 'Presents' | 2 | 8 |
| [?Rhynchonella Bed, and Ostrea acuminata Limestones remanié]. Marl, brown, clayey, with oysters and a few pebbles bored by Lithophaga | 0 | 2 |
| [? Sevenhampton Marl] Manly limestone, crowded with oysters; Lima cardiiformis, Modiola sp., Pholadomya solitaria, Pinna ampla. and occasional plant remains, locally passing into a hard limestone | 2 | 0 |
| ?1–5. Flagstones. Limestones, massive, flaggy, in the main blue-hearted, but locally yellow and oolitic. Contain locally pebbles of oolite, and, in cavities in the lower part of the bottom stratum (5), green clay | 6 | 6 |
| 6. Green Clay, locally sandy average thickness | 0 | 2 |
| 7–8. Pendle. (a) Sandstone, hard, grey (weathering brown), rarely passing into a brown, irregularly laminated fissile sandstone | 2 | 8 |
| (b) Limestone, hard, grey, sandy [Non-sequence: no evidence for the equivalent to the Planking] | 1 | 6 |
| 9. Sandy limestone, hard, grey at the top, brown and shaly, containing flat marl pellets. Surface undulating and water-worn. Placunopsis socialis common in the top layer. Said to be a very bad hard bed and not worked |
Richardson (1929) equated the bulk of the exposure in Huntsman's Quarry with the 'StonesfieldSlate Series' low in the Great Oolite Group in the classic Hampen Railway cutting section. Arkell (1933, p. 278) and McKerrow and Baden-Powell (1953, p. 92) followed this assignment. Sellwood and McKerrow (1974, p. 193) assigned beds 1–9, and the three units above these in Richardson's section, to the Cotswold Slate, which they renamed the Eyford Member
The fauna from Huntsman's Quarry consists of reptiles, fishes, arthropods, molluscs (including rare ammonites), annelids, starfish and plants (Richardson, 1929). The invertebrate fauna is distinctive, differing in many ways from that of the beds above and below, and also from stratigraphically equivalent units elsewhere. The bivalve Myophorella impressa (formerly Trigonia) is the most abundant fossil. Other bivalves include Liostrea, Gervillella and Chlamys. Rhynchonellid brachiopods and gastropods are also a common component of the fauna, but other marine invertebrates, including ammonites, echinoderms (crinoids and starfish) and barnacles (represented by plates), are rare. Insects are also present, the commonest being beetles, which are represented in the deposit by their resistant elytra. There is a substantial flora which includes ferns and early conifers (leaves, seeds and fruit), ginkgo leaves and 'carpolithes' seeds.
The reptile remains apparently occurred as isolated bones. Most of the specimens are relatively small (crocodile and dinosaur teeth, pterosaur limb bones), which suggests some degree of sorting. The association with marine invertebrates (e.g. barnacles, starfish, ammonites, belemnites) indicates transport or reworking of the terrestrial forms at least. Nothing is known of the taphonomy of the vertebrates since the matrix has been removed from the museum specimens.
The reptilian fauna from Huntsman's Quarry includes dinosaurs, crocodilians, pterosaurs and a turtle. One of the best collections was made by the Rev. E.F. Witts (1813–86) and it is now preserved in GLCRM (Savage, 1963). Unfortunately, many museum specimens are labelled simply 'Eyeford', which could refer to any of the quarries on the east side of Eyford Hill (e.g.
Testudines
'Chelonian indet.' Carapace; BMNH R2634
Archosauria: Crocodylia: Thalattosuchia:
Steneosauridae
Steneosaurus brevidens (Phillips, 1871) Teeth: BMNH 28611, 82631; GLCRM G.53–58
Teleosaurus sublidens Phillips, 1871 Teeth: BMNH 28611, R2632–3; BGS(GSM) G.1–51; jaws: BGS(GSM) G.52, 77; BGS(GSM) (various: 'Naunton')
Steneosaurus/Teleosaurus sp. Teeth: BMNH R6777, R6778 ('Huntsman's Quarry'), R6779–81; BGS(GSM) 113 735–6, 113 759, 113 764–8; rib: BGS(GSM) 11838; scute: BGS(GSM) 72280 ('Naunton'), BGS(GSM) GLCRM 59–60, various bones: GLCRM 558–62
Dinosauria: Saurischia: Theropoda:
Megalosauridae
Megalosaurus bucklandi Meyer, 1832 Teeth: BMNH 28608, R2635; limb bones and ribs GLCRM G.70–1, G.72–3, G.74–6 Megalosaurus sp. Tibia: OUM J.29759
Archosauria: Pterosauria: 'Rhamphorhynchoidea'
Rhamphocephalus sp. Limb-bones, a ?proximal phalanx and pectoral girdle elements: BMNH R6782, Munchen 1976 1.41–4 ('Huntsman's Quarry'); BGS(GSM) 113 728–31, 113 733, 113 738, 113 747, 113 753, 113 758, 113 670, unnumb.; GLCRM G.61–2
The Cotswold Slates (Eyford Member) are dated to the progracilis Zone (early Mid Bathonian) on the basis of sparse ammonites. Richardson (1929, p. 114) noted the occurrence of Perisphinctes gracilis (Buckman), reidentified as Procerites progracilis Cox and Arkell, in the Cotswold Slates of the Eyford area. Procerites mirabilis Arkell was found at Eyford and Huntsman's Quarry (Arkell 1951–8, pp. 199–201; Torrens 1969b, pp. 71–2). These isolated Finds place the Cotswold Slates within the progracilis Zone (Torrens, 1969b, pp. 71–3; in Cope et al., 1980b, p. 35, fig. 6a), although correlation of all the beds in Richardson's (1929) section is unclear.
The turtle carapace has not been identified, but it may belong to the genus Protochelys which occurs at Stonesfield in rocks of similar age.
The long-snouted marine crocodilians Steneosaurus and Teleosaurus from Huntsman's Quarry are represented largely by teeth. These have been identified by comparison with other Bathonian specimens from the Stonesfield Slate (Stonesfield Member), White Limestone and Forest Marble of Oxfordshire and Northamptonshire. These crocodilians were evidently relatively rather abundant in the Cotswold Slate, rather more so than in the Stonesfield Slate.
The teeth and tibia of Megalosaurus have, again, been identified by comparison with material from the White Limestone of Oxfordshire, Dorset and other localities in Gloucestershire.
The pterosaur bones have been hard to identify since they consist mainly of wing elements. They may belong to the genus Rhamphocephalus, but the significance of that genus is unclear. A fine pterosaur skull impression from the Cotswold Slate of Kyneton Thorns Quarry nearby
In a manuscript catalogue of the Charing Pearce collection in BRSMG, teeth of Ichthyosaurus and Plesiosaurus from Eyford are mentioned, but the specimens have not been located. Some probable plesiosaur teeth are preserved in Gloucester (GLCRM G.63–9, 78–80).
The reptile fauna from Huntsman's Quarry may be compared with that of other quarries in the Cotswold Slate, some of which have already been mentioned. The cluster of ten or more quarries on the east side of Eyford Hill (scattered around
Huntsman's Quarry contains the largest extant exposure of the Cotswold Slate (Eyford Member), and it has yielded the best reptile fauna of that unit. The fauna is placed temporally between that of New Park Quarry and other quarries in the Chipping Norton Formation (zigzag Zone), and sites in the White Limestone and Forest Marble (subcontractus–discus Zones) of Oxfordshire. The fauna is far less abundant and diverse than that of the Stonesfield Slate, but it is of considerable importance in view of the great local variations in deposition in the Cotswolds and Oxfordshire at the time. Its conservation value lies in this importance and its potential for future finds.