Stephenson, D., Leslie, A.G., Mendum, J.R., Tanner, P.W.G., Treagus, J.E. (Editors) 2013. The Dalradian of Scotland. "Accepted manuscript" version. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association Vol. 124 Issues 1–2
2 River Leven section
J.E. Treagus
Published in: The Dalradian rocks of the central Grampian Highlands of Scotland. PGA 124 (1–2) 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2012.07.009. Also on NORA
2.1 Introduction
The River Leven, east of Kinlochleven, provides a virtually continuous section, from the uppermost formation of the Grampian Group (the Eilde Flag Formation) through the three lowest members of the Loch Treig Schist and Quartzite Formation at the base of the Appin Group (the Eilde Quartzite, the Eilde Schists, and the Binnein Quartzite)
The stratigraphical succession and the broad structural relationships of the Kinlochleven area have been described by Bailey (1960), with detailed structural data relating to the two regional phases of deformation being provided by Treagus (1974). A description of the GCR site was included in a guide to the Loch Leven area by Roberts and Treagus (1977b). A different interpretation of the structure was proposed by Hickman (1978), but this was refuted by Roberts and Treagus (1980).
2.2 Description
The GCR site extends from the youngest rocks at
The Eilde Schists are dark-grey pelites and semipelites with ribs of quartzite and feldspathic psammite, particularly near the top and bottom transitional beds, where carbonaceous and calcareous beds are also more common. Much of the accessible outcrop is in the flat limbs of folds, which are knee-shaped and tens of metres in wavelength; these folds verge north-west with an axial-planar, steep NW-dipping, intensely-developed, crenulation cleavage. The junction of the Eilde Schists with the Eilde Quartzite is exposed at about
The junction with the Eilde Flags at the top of the Grampian Group is easily identified at the point where an overflow channel from the pipeline to the south joins the river at
2.3 Interpretation
The section in the River Leven is so unbroken and the way-up indicators are so unambiguous, that there can be no doubt that it provides a continuous stratigraphical section from the Eilde Flags (oldest), at the top of the Grampian Group, through the Eilde Quartzite and the Eilde Schists into the Binnein Quartzite, the lowest members of the Loch Treig Schist and Quartzite Formation at the base of the Lochaber Subgroup in the Appin Group. Most importantly, the attitude and style of the minor structures is consistent throughout the section and there is no evidence for a tectonic or metamorphic break at the junction between the Grampian and Appin group rocks. This observation became important with the assertion by Piasecki and van Breeman (1983) that rocks near Aviemore, which they assigned to the lower part of the Grampian Group, share a structural and tectonic event, then dated at 750 Ma, with underlying migmatitic rocks. Since there is no evidence in the Appin Group of events of this age, it appeared at that time that there must be a tectonic and/or metamorphic break within, or at the top of, the Grampian Group. However, since all of the rocks with evidence of a 750 Ma or older event (the date has subsequently been revised to c. 800 Ma) are now regarded as part of the pre-Grampian Group Badenoch Group (see Leslie et al., 2013), such an interpretation is no longer necessary.
The Grampian–Appin group junction exposed in the River Leven had been proposed as a possible site of a major tectonic boundary on the basis of the change in sedimentary environment (Lambert, 1975). However, the change in the nature of the metasedimentary lithologies at this junction does not mark a dramatic alteration in the original sedimentary environment. The major change is from the more-feldspathic (K-feldspar rich in thin section) Eilde Flags and their unusually coarse pebble beds into the cleaner Eilde Quartzite (plagioclase rich in thin section); however, psammites with mixtures of both feldspars occur in both the Eilde Quartzite and Eilde Schists, as well as in the Glen Coe Quartzite to the west of the GCR site, and the ‘background’ semipelite and pelite in all units remains of a consistent nature. The scale and nature of the cross-bedding and slump-folds also remains consistent across the junction.
Throughout the section, the minor- and intermediate-scale folds, with their associated cleavage, consistently verge north-west in a series of step-like folds. The cleavage in the pelites is very intensely developed and might be mistaken for a first cleavage, but in thin section it is clearly a crenulation of an earlier penetrative cleavage (Treagus, 1974). In fact in some locations it is possible to see an angle between bedding and this earlier penetrative cleavage, but the plunge of their apparent intersection and their vergence relationship is so variable as to render these observations of no use in the determination of facing of the first structures. The folds and dominant cleavage belong to the regional D2 phase of Treagus (1974); the intermediate-scale folds are on the eastern limb of the major F2 Kinlochleven Anitiform (which can be seen clearly from the western part of the GCR site in the hills to the north of Kinlochleven). Minor F2 folds and cleavage on the western limb of this fold are seen in the Nathrach GCR site. At Nathrach, D1 structures face downwards and, according to the regional structural interpretation of Treagus (1974), the Kinlochleven Antiform would be responsible for a change in the facing of D1 structures to steeply upward-facing on its eastern limb; this facing has not been confirmed in the rocks exposed in the River Leven GCR site, but should be a subject of future research. Bailey (1960), by contrast, considered that the rocks of this GCR site lie in the hinge area of a major recumbent F1 syncline, facing towards the west, a view that was shared by Hickman (1978). In the latter view, minor F1 folds and their axial planar cleavage would be recumbent, but the minor structure evidence presented here does not conform with that interpretation.
2.4 Conclusions
The River Leven Section GCR site is of national importance in demonstrating the continuity of sedimentation and the similarity of structural features across the boundary between the Grampian and Appin groups of the Dalradian succession. It is therefore not a candidate for the location of a major break in the history of geological events in the Scottish Highlands, as had once been suggested. The site provides a unique continuous section across the topmost formation of the Grampian Group into the loweest formation of the Appin Group and is rich in structures that provide evidence both for the sedimentary environment of these rocks and for their deformation history. The small-scale deformational structures (folds and cleavages) are important in the reconstruction of the largest-scale folds, many kilometres in length, that make up this western part of the Grampian Mountain Belt; the site will be important for further research in this respect.