Waltham, A.C., Simms, M.J., Farrant, A.R. and Goldie, H.S. 1997. Karst and Caves of Great Britain. Geological Conservation Review Series No. 12, JNCC, Peterborough, ISBN 0 412 78860 8. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Cliff Force Cave and the Buttertubs
Highlights
Cliff Force Cave is the finest known example of an inter-dales cave, in which geological structure has allowed the underground drainage to cross beneath a major surface watershed. The Buttertubs are a series of spectacular potholes developed by small sinking streams meeting a thin limestone, with open shafts descending directly to the underlying aquiclude.
Introduction
The well known Buttertubs potholes and the entrance to Cliff Force Cave lie within 150 m of each other on opposite sides of the Cliff Beck valley. This is cut into the steep fells of Muker Common, descending from the Buttertubs Pass on the south side of Swaledale
Cliff Force Cave has been documented briefly by Langthorne (1976), Clough and Clough (1981), Ryder (1981) and Brook et al. (1988). The Buttertubs are widely cited as examples of limestone potholes, but further comment on their morphology is only brief (Waltham, 1984).
Description
Cliff Force Cave contains about 2000 m of passages reached through an abandoned exit just above the present resurgence
Where Lover Gill crosses the Main Limestone, north of Cliff Force Cave
The Buttertubs are a series of open vadose shafts in a narrow bench formed on the top of the Main Limestone along the west side of the Cliff Beck valley
Interpretation
Cliff Force Cave is one of a number of underground drainage routes carrying flow beneath the major surface watershed between Swaledale and Wensleydale (Ryder, 1975). It demonstrates clearly the fundamental control by geological structure on karst drainage routes; the Sargill streams flow south-east on the surface towards Wensleydale, until they sink underground and flow north down the dip towards Swaledale. Geological controls have influenced the cave in many ways. A few bedding planes and shale bands were the inception horizons for the whole cave, but the extensive collapse in the upstream sections has occurred beneath a thin, incompetent mudstone band; this was clearly not an inception horizon as it lies above the solutional features within the roof. Joint fissures are a part of the cave morphology, but the stream route has not encountered any old phreatic networks comparable to the maze fragments breached by Lover Gill. Phreatic solution and collapse along the mineralized fault which crosses the drainage line has produced the large Fault Hall; however, the cave has continued to follow the bedding, perhaps because the fault has none of the older phreatic rifts on the scale of those on faults in the karst of north Wales and the Peak District.
Unlike many caves in the thin limestones of the northern Pennines, Cliff Force Cave has evolved through several levels of passage development. Upstream of Fault Hall there is only a single phreatic passage, barely modified since it was partially drained. Downstream of Fault Hall there are three levels, of which only the active streamway is lower than the upstream passage. For much of the cave's history, water in the upstream passage was ponded behind a small phreatic lift on the fault. The highest level is only represented by passages close to the resurgence entrance; these may have been reached by a second phreatic lift, perhaps part of an old vauclusian resurgence system now obscured by glacial debris on the valley side. The second level is represented by the Spar Shop Series feeding to the dry passages and the present entrance; this was also active via the Fault Hall phreatic lift. The active streamway has a third level of initial phreatic development, followed by rejuvenation and vadose entrenchment.
The three cave levels are all primarily phreatic, and appear to reflect successive stages of phreatic flow on lower inception horizons within a maturing aquifer. Only the last stage of vadose incision can be directly related to lowering of the resurgence. A scarcity of calcite speleothems in the cave is a consequence of the location beneath an impermeable shale cover, and no evidence of absolute ages is yet available. Though the stages may relate to the glacial excavation of Swaledale, it would be premature to relate rejuvenations to valley floor positions, when the resurgence position may have been so easily influenced by details of geological structure in such a narrow limestone outcrop. The inception stage for the development of this cave may have been exceptionally long, as it lies in a thin limestone with non-carbonate rocks both above and below; these would have excluded infiltration flows of soil water, though the underlying sandstone may have carried some primary groundwater flow. The lithology of the Main Limestone may include features very pertinent to cave inception and karstic evolution in carbonates not directly exposed to the surface.
The Buttertubs present a striking contrast to Cliff Force Cave. They are classic examples of invasion vadose shafts developed close to a steep valley side, with horizontal cave development only at the base of the limestone where the underlying aquiclude has perched the groundwater flow. Relaxation opening of the limestone fractures, towards the destressed hillside, may have accelerated early development of the shafts, whose position and lack of fill are essentially post-Devensian. The deeply fluted shafts demonstrate the role of small flows of corrosive water rich in carbon dioxide and organic acids from soil and peat. In both these respects, the Buttertubs are not typical of the many Pennine potholes which are at large stream sinks feeding cave drainage routes to distant resurgences. They are, however, spectacular and very accessible karstic shafts.
Conclusion
Cliff Force Cave is the prime example of a cave developed in a thin limestone by drainage passing beneath a major surface watershed. Geological controls, both structural and lithological, have influenced the configuration and morphology of the cave, producing a cave system on multiple phreatic levels, which is unusual in the thinner limestones of the northern Pennines. The Buttertubs are the product of entirely vadose development in the same limestone, with simple vertical shafts descending to the underlying aquiclude and draining rapidly into the adjacent valley.